Skip to content
    MNR
    Earnings call· Jun 2026(Q2 FY26)

    MACH NATURAL RESOURCES Q2 FY26 earnings call MNR

    Aug 7, 2026 Source

    Executive summary

    Mach Natural Resources Q2 FY26 — Deleveraging Focus Amidst Flexible Capital Allocation

    Mach Natural Resources LP reported Q2 FY26 results highlighting its unique cash-return model, disciplined capital allocation, and strategic flexibility. The company continues to prioritize financial strength by aiming to reduce leverage to 1x Net Debt to EBITDA by the end of 2027, utilizing an ATM equity program and potentially adjusting distributions. Capital allocation remains fluid, pivoting between oil and gas drilling based on commodity prices and rates of return, with a focus on high-return plays like the Oswego Limestone and the emerging Mancos Shale.

    Highlights

    5
    • Achieved an industry-leading Cash Return on Capital (CROC) averaging 35% over the past 5 years, placing it in the top 1% of U.S. public companies.

    • Maintained an industry-leading distribution yield of 15% since 2024 through Q1 2026, with cumulative distributions of $6.67 per unit since 2024.

    • Reported Q2 FY26 production of 149,000 BOE per day, with 15% oil, 69% natural gas, and 16% NGLs.

    • Significantly reduced Mancos Shale 3-mile lateral completed well costs from historical ~$20 million to an expected ~$13 million for the ongoing program.

    • Ended the quarter with $41 million in cash and $270 million of availability under its credit facility.

    Concerns

    4
    • Projected Net Debt to EBITDA of 1.4x by year-end, exceeding the company's stated goal of 1x.

    • Q2 FY26 distribution per unit decreased to $0.36, reflecting the variable distribution policy tied to CapEx and operating cash flow.

    • Natural gas prices below $3/Mcf make gas drilling difficult, leading to deferral of Mancos Shale completions until next year.

    • Clearfork drilling locations, with a 53% rate of return, were deferred due to lower oil prices and competition for capital from higher-return projects like Oswego.

    Guidance & targets

    3
    CategoryTargetConfidence
    Net Debt to EBITDA
    1x
    high materiality
    High
    Mancos Shale natural gas production
    >500 MMcf/d
    medium materiality
    Medium
    Mancos Shale 3-mile lateral completed well cost
    ~$13 million per well
    medium materiality
    High

    Operational metrics

    41
    Production volume
    149,000
    Q2 FY26
    Realized oil price
    $95.4
    Q2 FY26
    Realized natural gas price
    $1.93
    Q2 FY26
    Realized NGL price
    $28.99
    Q2 FY26
    Oil revenue contribution
    54%
    Q2 FY26

    Of $360 million total oil and gas revenues.

    Natural gas revenue contribution
    30%
    Q2 FY26

    Of $360 million total oil and gas revenues.

    NGL revenue contribution
    16%
    Q2 FY26

    Of $360 million total oil and gas revenues.

    Lease operating expense
    $98M
    Q2 FY26
    Cash G&A
    $7M
    Q2 FY26
    Cash and equivalents
    $41M
    Q2 FY26
    Credit facility availability
    $270M
    Q2 FY26
    Adjusted EBITDA
    $182M
    Q2 FY26
    Development Capital expenditure
    $97M
    Q2 FY26
    Development Capital expenditure
    50%
    YTD Q2 FY26
    Cash available for distribution
    $60M
    Q2 FY26
    Distribution per unit
    $0.36
    Q2 FY26
    Cumulative distributions to unitholders
    $6.67
    Since 2024
    Distribution yield
    15%
    Since 2024 through Q1 FY26
    Cash Return on Capital (CROC)
    35%
    Past 5 years
    Cash Return on Capital (CROC)
    53%
    FY22
    Cash Return on Capital (CROC)
    23%
    FY25
    Cash Return on Capital (CROC)
    20%never less than
    Since inception
    Reinvestment rate
    <50%
    Ongoing
    Acreage held by production
    3M
    Current
    Oswego Limestone well cost
    $3.3M
    Current
    Oswego Limestone expected oil recovery
    160,000
    Per well
    Oswego Limestone rate of return
    87%
    Current
    Mancos Shale acreage
    575,000
    Current
    Mancos Shale natural gas production
    350
    Current

    Can be held flat by drilling only 5 net wells per year.

    Mancos Shale initial production rates
    >25
    Recent
    Mancos Shale footprint size
    1/3vs Marcellus
    Current
    San Juan Basin natural gas production
    >500
    Last 5 years

    Increased more than tenfold.

    Gas marketing agreement
    Through 2030
    Current
    At-the-market (ATM) equity program
    $100M
    Current
    Sycamore drilling locations
    3
    Remaining
    Oswego wells drilled
    >250
    Since June 2021
    Mancos Shale 3-mile lateral well cost
    $20M
    Historical
    Mancos Shale 3-mile lateral well cost
    <$15M
    Target
    Mancos Shale 3-mile lateral well cost
    $13M
    Ongoing program
    Clearfork rate of return
    53%
    End of July

    Compared to Oswego in the 80s.

    Clearfork drilling locations
    8
    Current

    Not hundreds of locations.

    Industry KPIs

    10
    MetricValueDetails
    D c efficiency rig activity
    Pipeline throughput storage
    Realized price differential$95.4 (oil), $1.93 (gas), $28.99 (NGL)USD/bbl, USD/Mcf, USD/bbl
    Sanctioned expansion backlog
    Basin level production volume149,000BOE/d
    Cost of supply unit cash cost
    FCF shareholder distributions$60MUSD
    Take or pay contract structure
    Weather event volume earnings impact
    Distributable cash flow per unit share$60MUSD

    Deals & partnerships

    3
    SabinalOil assetslow $60s per barrel range

    Acquired oil assets when crude prices were in the low $60s per barrel range. Assets have less than a 10% decline and substantial drilling room.

    [indiscernible]Natural gas assets in San Juanless than $10

    Acquired natural gas assets in the San Juan at less than $10. Assets have less than a 10% decline and substantial drilling room.

    Not namedAdmore Basin assetspaid the first lien RBO lenders at a on the dollar

    Acquired through a 363 bankruptcy process in April 2020 against a $20 oil strip, which made lending institutions leery of investing in the Mid-Con, providing running room for further acquisitions.

    Risks & headwinds

    4
    Net Debt to EBITDA above targetBy end of 2027

    1.4x projected by year-end, target is 1x.

    Mitigation: Utilizing an at-the-market (ATM) equity program ($100M), potential distribution cuts, and equity-funded accretive acquisitions.

    Low natural gas pricesNear-term (winter, next summer)

    Under $3/Mcf makes gas drilling difficult.

    Mitigation: Pivoting to oil-weighted drilling, deferring gas completions, maintaining flexible capital allocation, and holding a long-term bullish outlook for natural gas.

    Increased competition for cash-flowing assetsCurrent

    More capital is now chasing the same type of cash flowing assets, leading to premiums above the company's model.

    Mitigation: Maintaining a disciplined acquisition strategy, focusing on internal drilling opportunities, and using equity for accretive acquisitions.

    Reluctance to sell assets or acreage for deleveragingOngoing

    Selling assets results in loss of cash flow; selling acreage risks divesting future high-return plays.

    Mitigation: Prioritizing other deleveraging methods like the ATM program and potential distribution adjustments over asset sales.

    What to watch in Q3 FY26

    4

    Net Debt to EBITDA

    Next quarter / By end of 2027
    Current1.4x (projected end of year)
    TargetProgress towards 1x

    Why it matters

    This is a key financial strength pillar and impacts the company's ability to make future opportunistic acquisitions.

    Our team is dedicated to meet our goal before the end of 2027.

    Q&A highlights

    6

    Can you confirm the near-term D&C focus on Oswego and discuss the activity and economics?

    Confirmed Oswego as the ongoing drilling focus through Q4 and into 2027 due to its high rates of return (85% at $75 oil). Mentioned Red Fork for next year and Mancos for gas if prices rebound.

    The ongoing drilling program that we have through Q4 of this year, is to keep an Oswego rig running.

    asked by Neal Dingmann · answered by Tom Ward

    3 min read6 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    Strategic Pillars and Business Model

    Mach Natural Resources operates on four strategic pillars: disciplined execution (acquiring cash-flowing assets at PV-10 or less, avoiding PUDs), disciplined reinvestment (less than 50% of operating cash flow), maintaining financial strength (target 1x debt to EBITDA), and maximizing unitholder distributions. This model focuses on buying distressed assets at discounted prices that generate immediate cash flow, enabling industry-leading cash returns on capital and distributions. The company leverages its 3 million acres of held-by-production land to maintain production flat while spending less than 50% of operating cash flow.

    02

    Capital Allocation Flexibility and Drilling Strategy

    The company maintains a highly fluid drilling schedule, capable of quickly pivoting between oil and natural gas projects based on commodity prices and rates of return. This flexibility is a hallmark of its operations, allowing it to shift from natural gas to crude-heavy drilling post-Iran conflict, and previously from oil-weighted to natural gas drilling post-tariff date in April 2025. This adaptability ensures capital is directed to the highest-return opportunities, even if it means deferring projects like Clearfork or Mancos completions until market conditions improve.

    03

    Mancos Shale: An Emerging Natural Gas Opportunity

    The Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin is highlighted as one of North America's most compelling emerging natural gas plays. Mach holds 575,000 acres in the region, with well performance comparable to the Haynesville and Marcellus shales, and recent initial production rates exceeding 25 MMcf/d. The play benefits from a mature natural gas transportation network, with expectations for additional takeaway capacity to premium markets by 2029-2030. Mach believes it can grow Mancos production from 350 MMcf/d to over 500 MMcf/d by increasing activity to 10 net wells per year.

    04

    Oswego Limestone: A Drilling Workhorse

    The Oswego Limestone formation in Kingfisher County, Oklahoma, continues to be a core asset and a 'workhorse' for the company's drilling program. Mach has drilled over 250 wells in this area since June 2021. The Oswego offers high rates of return, estimated at 87% at a $75 oil strip, due to efficient drilling and completion costs of approximately $3.3 million per well for an expected 160,000 barrels of oil recovery. The company plans to keep a rig running in the Oswego through 2027, depending on oil prices.

    05

    Deleveraging Commitment and Strategy

    Mach is committed to reducing its Net Debt to EBITDA ratio to its stated goal of 1x by the end of 2027, down from a projected 1.4x at year-end. Management is exploring several avenues, including an at-the-market (ATM) equity program to place $100 million of equity, potentially cutting distributions (as done in 2024), and pursuing accretive acquisitions funded by equity. The company acknowledges the challenge of high capital chasing limited deals but emphasizes the importance of financial strength for future opportunistic acquisitions.

    06

    Q2 FY26 Financial Performance

    For Q2 FY26, Mach reported total oil and gas revenues of $360 million, with oil contributing 54%, gas 30%, and NGLs 16%. Adjusted EBITDA was $182 million, and operating cash flow reached $154 million. Development CapEx for the quarter was $97 million, representing 63% of operating cash flow, though year-to-date CapEx remained at 50% of operating cash flow. Cash available for distribution was $60 million, resulting in a distribution of $0.36 per unit.

    AI-generated summary of the company’s earnings call. Not investment advice.