Skip to content

    Eternal Ltd

    ETERNALGood
    Consumer Services·21 Jul 2025
    Management Summary

    Eternal's Q1 FY26 was dominated by Blinkit's rapid expansion and strategic shift to a 1P inventory model. Quick commerce continued to grow strongly with most growth coming from existing polygons rather than new city expansion. Food delivery growth decelerated to 13% YoY but management indicated early signs of bottoming out with improving app opens and resurrection rates. The company maintained a disciplined approach on competition, noting improved competitive dynamics versus the prior quarter.

    Highlights

    8
    • Blinkit reached 1,500+ dark stores with visibility to scale to 3,000 stores

    • Delhi Blinkit GOV grew 70% YoY despite being geographically well-covered

    • Less than 5% of Blinkit growth came from new expansion areas

    • Blinkit Adjusted EBITDA margin improved from -2.4% to -1.8% sequentially

    • Blinkit Contribution margin at 3.9% of NOV vs 4.9% year ago

    • Blinkit MTUs reached ~17 million vs ~23 million for food delivery

    • Food delivery NOV growth at 13% YoY, down from 27% in year-ago quarter

    • Announced shift to 1P inventory ownership model for Blinkit over 2-3 quarters with ~100bps margin benefit

    Concerns

    2
    • Quick commerce competitive intensity may resurge if competitors raise capital

    • Food delivery growth deceleration with NOV growth dropping from 27% to 13% YoY

    What Changed2

    vs Q3 FY26

    Guidance items8 → 5 (-3)Q&A highlights8 → 3 (-5)

    Key financials

    Single quarter

    07 metrics
    1. 01Blinkit GOV (Annualized)5,000 Mn
    2. 02Blinkit Dark Stores1,500 stores
    3. 03Blinkit MTUs17 Mn
    4. 04Food Delivery MTCs23 Mn
    5. 05Blinkit Adjusted EBITDA Margin-1.8%

    Segment breakdown

    Blinkit (Quick Commerce)
    -1.8% Adj EBITDA Margin3.9% Contribution Margin2.5% Mature Store Margin
    Food Delivery
    13% NOV Growth YoY
    Going Out (District)
    Losses Trend
    List

    Guidance & targets

    5
    CategoryTargetPriority
    Quick Commerce
    1P Inventory Transition
    Most inventory on own books within 2-3 quarters
    High
    Quick Commerce
    1P Margin Benefit
    ~100 basis points Contribution margin improvement
    High
    Quick Commerce
    Store Count Visibility
    3,000 stores
    High
    Quick Commerce
    EBITDA Margin Direction
    Continued improvement toward profitability
    Medium
    Food Delivery
    Growth Rate
    20% long-term, near-term visibility unclear
    Medium

    Risks & concerns

    9
    RiskSeverity

    Quick commerce competitive intensity may resurge if competitors raise capital

    Management acknowledged they will react to competitive circumstances and maintaining leadership position is priority, potentially at the cost of profitabilityBoth acknowledged

    high

    Food delivery growth deceleration with NOV growth dropping from 27% to 13% YoY

    Management noted slowdown in transacting customers and app opens, but pointed to early signs of recovery in Q2 FY26Both acknowledged

    high

    Quick commerce cannibalization of food delivery

    Akshant acknowledged quick commerce has been a headwind for food delivery as some consumption moved to quick commerceAnalyst acknowledged

    medium

    GLP-1 drugs potentially impacting food consumption and delivery volumes

    Management said it's too early and nascent to have a view, noting no GLP-1 impact seen in food delivery in other countriesAnalyst downplayed

    low

    Going-out segment (District) losses and Bistro investment uncertainty

    Losses expected to remain range-bound; no specific guidance on Bistro AOVs or short-term trajectoryBoth acknowledged

    medium

    Areas of Evasion(4)

    • Category breakdown for Blinkit
    • Bistro AOVs
    • Leadership KPIs and rotation criteria
    • Same-store sales metrics

    Q&A highlights

    3

    “In that timeframe, we should be able to move most of our business to inventory ownership and the margin accretion should also happen in that timeframe.”

    Strategic shift to 1P model is the biggest near-term catalyst for Blinkit margins, with ~100bps Contribution margin uplift expected

    asked by Manish Adukia (Goldman Sachs)

    1 min read4 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    Blinkit's Strategic Pivot to 1P Inventory Model

    Blinkit announced a major shift from marketplace (3P) to owned inventory (1P) model, expected to complete within 2-3 quarters. This is projected to yield approximately 100 basis points improvement in Contribution margin. The change is primarily administrative, reducing compliance burden for brands while improving availability and fill rates. Revenue recognition will shift to become very similar to NOV as the company owns inventory directly.

    02

    Quick Commerce Growth Driven by Existing Markets

    Less than 5% of Blinkit's growth in Q1 FY26 came from new expansion areas, with the bulk driven by existing polygons. Delhi, a geographically well-covered market, grew 70% YoY. The company has visibility to 3,000 stores from the current 1,500+ and expects high growth rates for at least the next two years. Adjusted EBITDA margin improved from -2.4% to -1.8% sequentially, with some mature stores already at 2.5% margin.

    03

    Food Delivery Growth Deceleration Shows Early Signs of Reversal

    Food delivery NOV growth decelerated to 13% YoY from 27% a year ago, driven by a slowdown in transacting customers and app opens. However, management noted early signs of bottoming out with improving resurrection rates and better app engagement in the first three weeks of Q2. The company maintained its long-term 20% growth aspiration but acknowledged near-term visibility is limited.

    04

    Competitive Dynamics and Market Positioning

    Management noted improvement in competitive dynamics versus three months ago and expects margins and absolute losses to improve. However, they remained cautious, emphasizing they will react to market circumstances and prioritize maintaining leadership position. Notably, Blinkit rejected the megapod/MAX saver model adopted by competitors, stating they don't see the opportunity in 30-40 minute delivery timeframes.

    This is an AI-generated summary of a publicly available earnings call transcript. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an endorsement. inve.money is not a SEBI-registered investment advisor. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.