Fusion Finance Limited — Q1 FY26 earnings call

Call held 11 Aug 2025

Management summary

Fusion Finance reported a strong Q1 FY26 with significant improvements in asset quality, collection efficiency, and Net Interest Margin (NIM). Credit costs declined, and GNPA/NNPA ratios improved. While the company continues to report losses, these have narrowed, and management is focused on operational efficiency and calibrated growth, with a cautious approach to new customer acquisition.

Highlights

  • Credit costs declined to ₹178 Cr in Q1 FY26 from ₹253 Cr in Q4 FY25 and ₹571 Cr two quarters back.

  • GNPA improved to 5.43% from 7.92% last quarter, and NNPA stands at about 0.19%.

  • Current bucket collection efficiency improved to 98.55% from 98.44% in the previous quarter.

  • NIM improved by 172 bps QoQ to 10.29%, driven by higher lending yields and reduced Stage 3 assets.

  • Q1 FY26 disbursement stood at ₹950 Cr, reflecting encouraging growth momentum.

Concerns

  • Losses narrowed to ₹92.25 Cr compared to ₹165 Cr in Q4 FY25, indicating continued unprofitability.

  • Operating expenses remain high due to continued investments in field and tech infrastructure.

  • Cost to income ratio was 70.81%, marginally higher than Q4 FY25 (69.61%) due to portfolio contraction.

  • Marginal cost of funds rose 160 bps to 13.3% due to the timing of new borrowings.

Key financials

  1. Credit Costs ₹178 Cr -29.5%QoQ
  2. GNPA 5.4% -31.3%QoQ
  3. NNPA 0.19%
  4. NIM 10.3% +1.7%QoQ
  5. Disbursement ₹950 Cr
  6. Losses ₹92.25 Cr -44.3%QoQ
  7. Cost to Income Ratio 70.8% +1.7%QoQ
  8. Operating Expenses ₹210 Cr +1.9%QoQ

What they filed

Q1 FY27: revenue up 3.6%, net profit up 167.4% against the same quarter last year.

₹ Cr · quarterly
Line itemQ2 FY25Q3 FY25Q4 FY25Q1 FY26Q2 FY26Q3 FY26Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
Revenue692 474 466 442 401 −42%416 −12%424 −9%458 +4%
Net profit-305 -719 -165 -92 -22 +93%14 +102%114 +169%62 +167%
How to read this

₹ crore, as filed. The percentage beside a figure is the change against the same quarter a year earlier — never the quarter before, which would make every seasonal business look like it collapses and booms each year.

Segment breakdown

  • MSME Vertical
    ₹684 Cr AUM91% Secured Percentage42% Average LTV23% IRR50% Approval Rate

Capital allocation

high confidence
  • Debt Debt disclosed Cost 10.3%
    • New borrowing Raised fresh funds between January 25 and July 25, including ₹32 Cr through DA MSME and ₹81 Cr via PTC. Marginal cost rose 160 bps to 13.3% due to new borrowings with average tenure of 18 months. ₹1,220 Cr
    average cost of funds declined 25 bps QoQ to 10.27%, while marginal cost rose 160 bps to 13.3% due to the timing of new borrowings.
  • Liquidity Cash ₹724 Cr · Undrawn ₹1,496 Cr As of June 30, 2025, the company held ₹724 Cr in liquidity along with ₹1,496 Cr in sanctioned loans and ₹400 Cr of balance call money from the right issue. Capital adequacy remains strong at 29.52%.
    As of June 30, 2025, we hold Rs. 724 Cr in liquidity along with Rs. 1,496 Cr in sanctioned loans and Rs. 400 Cr of balance call money from the right issue. Our capital adequacy remains strong at 29.52%

Guidance & targets

Customer Mix

  • Fusion vs New to Fusion/New to Credit customer mix Customer Mix · by end of the year · Medium confidence 65% Fusion, 35% New to Fusion/New to Credit (equally divided)
    somewhere by end of the year what we intend to do is about 65% is Fusion, 35% will be New to Fusion and which will be equally divided between New to Credit and New to Fusion.

    — Mr. Sanjay Garyali

MSME Capacity

  • MSME branches MSME Capacity · next 2 years · Medium confidence 150-155 branches

    From 105 branches today

    We are close to have about 100 branches and we feel that about 100, 150, another 50 branches in the next 2 years should take us to a decent portfolio size.

    — Mr. Sanjay Garyali

Profitability

  • Net Interest Margin (NIM) Profitability · remain in that range · High confidence 10.25% to 10.5% (plus minus 25 bps)
    NIMs roughly close to about 10.25 to 10.5 plus minus 25 bps will remain in that range.

    — Mr. Sanjay Garyali

Operating Expenses

  • Operating Expenses (OPEX) Operating Expenses · subsequent quarters · Medium confidence trending downwards
    OPEX will continue to keep trending downwards.

    — Mr. Sanjay Garyali

What to watch in Q2 FY26

Path to Profitability

next quarter (Q2 FY26) or Q3 FY26
Current Losses narrowed to ₹92.25 Cr in Q1 FY26
Target Profitability (Q2 or Q3 FY26)

Why it matters

Key indicator of financial turnaround and sustainability, as management provided data for investors to infer the timeline.

Now, I cannot give you an exact forward looking statement that whether Q2 will be profitable or Q3 will be profitable... you will yourself get the confidence from a direction that we are able to set up that profits could happen quicker than a lot of us expected.

Risks & concerns

  • Prolonged Credit Cycle & Operational Headwinds

    medium

    FY25 was a challenging year for the industry marked by a prolonged credit cycle and operational headwinds, but Fusion remained proactive and transparent.

    Management acknowledged

  • Over-leveraged States/Customers

    medium

    While some states (AP and Telangana) are seen as over-leveraged, the problem is identified at a customer level, not state level, requiring continued watch on customer leverage.

    Management acknowledged

  • High Operating Expenses

    medium

    Operating expenses remain high due to continued investments in field and tech infrastructure, but management is actively working on efficiency and expects a downward trend.

    Management acknowledged

  • New Guardrails Impact on Growth

    low

    New guardrails implemented in April make it prudent for financial services companies to gain vintage before accelerating growth in New to Fusion or New to Credit customers.

    Management acknowledged

Q&A highlights

4 direct
Path to profitability (Q2/Q3 FY26) Partial
Now, I cannot give you an exact forward looking statement that whether Q2 will be profitable or Q3 will be profitable. That is the reason why we have shared data with you transparently, Abhijit. I think if you just put this in a model, and we have shared the flow rates with you, you will yourself get the confidence from a direction that we are able to set up that profits could happen quicker than a lot of us expected.

Analyst sought a clear timeline for profitability, but management provided data for inference rather than a direct commitment, indicating uncertainty.

Asked by Abhijit Tibrewal

AP & Telangana credit quality and fee income generation Partial
On the fee income we are looking at, give us some time, we will give you some good news on fee income in future that what are the opportunities we are looking at. We have already applied for a corporate agency license for insurance. We will come back to you and the progress is significant. We will come back to you in the next quarter on what the status is on that.

Analyst questioned regional credit risks and a potential new revenue stream; management indicated future updates on fee income, suggesting it's still in early stages.

Asked by Abhijit Tibrewal

Impact of 4% write-off, customer mix (Fusion+3), and approval rates Direct
If you look at the final guardrails that have actually come in April, it is prudent for any financial services company, not just microfinance, with a new set of guardrails, give some vintage before you start getting into, let us say, either New to Fusion or New to Credit or any customer which is little unknown to you. That is why the entire focus is initially on our existing customers and the guardrails that we have kept are not simple guardrails, they are very complex.

Analyst challenged the effectiveness of guardrails given write-offs and customer mix changes, prompting management to explain their cautious, phased approach to new customer segments.

Asked by Viral Shah

Collection efficiency, flow forward rates, and high PCR/coverage Direct
On the current bucket collection efficiency, let us say if you see the flow forward rates and your question is that because your new book is growing. The new book is currently at about 44%, so what kind of differentiation you are seeing between the old book and the new book and the weighted numbers, they should show. Now, if you see the previous number, when we closed the March quarter was at about 98.44, the average was 98.10, the end point was 98.44. Now, the same collection efficiency, if you look at in Q1 FY26 is 98.55, which means that it has gone up by about 11 bps.

Analyst probed the sustainability of collection improvements and the rationale behind maintaining high provisioning, receiving detailed figures on efficiency gains.

Asked by Rajiv Mehta

Field Officer load, OPEX trajectory, and operating leverage Direct
See, we cannot give exact guidance, but I am saying that is why we are sharing so much of information with you so that you can model it but like I said we are constantly pushing ourselves, we are cognizant of the fact that OPEX needs to come down. Wherever we are seeing processes which are obsolete and non-productive, we are cutting it without even thinking twice about it.

Analyst sought clarity on future operating expenses and efficiency gains from technology, with management emphasizing their focus on cost reduction and process optimization.

Asked by Pranav Gupta

Marginal cost of funds and OPEX leverage Direct
On the marginal interest on borrowing, instead of that, let us look at the NIMs, because that is what is critical. I think so there will be three things, two of them positive on NIM and the third one is cost of borrowing on the NIMs. While Aman will elaborate, some of this higher cost of borrowing comes because of lower tenure funds that we have got.

Analyst expressed concern over rising marginal cost of funds and its potential impact on margins, leading to management's clarification on NIM outlook and OPEX management.

Asked by Bhavesh Kanani

3 min read 7 chapters

Detailed narrative

Q1 FY26 Performance Overview

Fusion Finance reported a strong start to FY26, with performance reflecting early impacts of strategic actions taken last year. Credit costs moderated, collections remained robust, and the operating model showed greater consistency. The company is positioned to build momentum through the year and drive long-term value creation, despite FY25 being a challenging year for the industry marked by a prolonged credit cycle and operational headwinds.

Credit Quality and Asset Management

Credit costs declined significantly to ₹178 Cr in Q1 FY26 from ₹253 Cr in Q4 FY25 and ₹571 Cr two quarters prior. GNPA improved to 5.43% from 7.92% last quarter, and NNPA stood at 0.19%. Stage 3 provision coverage remained robust at 97%, with overall ECL provisions at ₹579 Cr, down from ₹887 Cr. The company revised its write-off policy from 240+ DPD to 180+ DPD, resulting in ₹486 Cr in write-offs this quarter to ensure early portfolio hygiene.

Disbursement and Growth Strategy

Q1 FY26 disbursements reached ₹950 Cr, showing encouraging growth momentum. The company's strategy remains disciplined, with 79% of disbursements coming from Fusion and Fusion+1 clients, and 76% to existing customers. New products Ujala and Sugam contributed 40% of July disbursements. Approval rates improved to around 20% in July from 12%-15% earlier, driven by maturing credit intelligence. The new book originated post-September 2024 now constitutes 44% of the portfolio and maintains a July current bucket demand efficiency above 99.5%.

Funding and Liquidity

Fusion Finance raised ₹1,220 Cr in fresh funds between January and July 2025. As of June 30, 2025, the company held ₹724 Cr in liquidity, with ₹1,496 Cr in sanctioned loans and ₹400 Cr from the right issue. Capital adequacy remains strong at 29.52%. The average cost of funds declined 25 bps QoQ to 10.27%, while the marginal cost rose 160 bps to 13.3% due to the timing of new borrowings, which had an average tenure of 18 months. NIM improved by 172 bps QoQ to 10.29%.

Operating Efficiency and Cost Management

The cost to income ratio was 70.81% in Q1 FY26, marginally higher than Q4 FY25 (69.61%) due to portfolio contraction. Operating expenses stood at 10.1% for the quarter, with MFI at 9.86% and MSME at 0.22%. Management indicated that OPEX will continue to trend downwards in subsequent quarters, driven by efficiency enhancements and optimization efforts, including in the MSME segment, which saw costs significantly come down in absolute terms over the last 3 months.

MSME Vertical Outlook

The MSME vertical is emerging as a second growth engine with an AUM of ₹684 Cr, 91% secured, and an average LTV of 42% and IRR of 23%. Operating across 8 states with 105 branches, the business maintains a 50% approval rate. Management expects significant growth in this segment, with plans to expand to 150-155 branches in the next two years, leveraging its distribution and credit assessment capabilities. The company noted that MSME costs have significantly come down in absolute terms over the last 3 months.

Leadership Transition and Strategic Focus

The company is undergoing a smooth leadership transition, with the new CEO, Sanjay Garyali, expressing gratitude and confidence in the team. The strategic focus is on strengthening the foundation, transitioning to a growth phase with caution, and leveraging a strong vintage in key MSME markets. The company is also investing in technology and process improvements to enhance operational efficiency, customer service, and grievance redressal, with key transformative projects on track for delivery by March 2026.

This is an AI-generated summary of a publicly available earnings call transcript.