Skip to content

    Namo eWaste

    NAMOEWASTE
    Utilities·29 May 2025
    Management Summary

    Namo eWaste reported strong top-line growth for FY24-25, with revenue up 50%, EBITDA up 29%, and PAT up 25%. However, margins faced pressure in H2 FY25 due to increased operational and expansion-related costs, as well as a full tax provision. The company is aggressively expanding its recycling capacity with new plants in Nasik and Hyderabad, aiming to capitalize on favorable regulatory changes and address raw material sourcing challenges. Management expects margin improvement going forward.

    Highlights

    5
    • Revenue for FY24-25 grew 50% YoY to ₹150.5 crores, reflecting strong performance.

    • EBITDA for FY24-25 rose 29% YoY, and PAT increased 25% YoY.

    • Current recycling capacity is over 30,500 metric tons per annum, with a target to scale to 68,000 metric tons per annum by Q3 FY26.

    • Stock price consistently traded above the issue price of Rs. 85, averaging Rs. 187 per share since listing on September 11, 2024.

    • New regulatory guidelines (EPR framework) are expected to provide a structural tailwind, compelling OEMs and brands to comply with higher recycling mandates.

    Concerns

    3
    • EBITDA and PAT margins declined in H2 FY25, primarily due to a rise in operational expenses, including logistic costs (doubled from ₹3.22 crores to ₹6.33 crores), expansion-related hiring, R&D, and pre-construction expenses for the Hyderabad facility.

    • Higher inventory levels were noted due to preloading for battery plant operations and bulk corporate discards received in Q4, impacting cash flow from operations.

    • A full tax provision of ₹3.22 crores was made in H2 FY25, impacting PAT, after legal opinion clarified tax exemption limitations.

    What Changed1

    vs Q2 FY26

    Guidance items9 → 8 (-1)

    Key financials

    Single quarter

    07 metrics
    1. 01Total Revenue₹150.5 Cr+50%YoY
    2. 02EBITDA Growth29.0%
    3. 03PAT Growth25%
    4. 04EBITDA Margin9.8%
    5. 05Logistic Cost₹6.33 Cr+96.6%YoY

    Segment breakdown

    • Recycling₹108 Cr71.8%
    • EPR₹18.5 Cr12.3%
    • Refurbishment₹24 Cr15.9%
    Donut· Share of Revenue

    Capital allocation

    3
    high confidence
    CategoryHeadline
    Capex

    Capex disclosed

    Majority from internal accruals, INR 11.2 crores for Nasik from IPO proceeds.

    Debt

    Debt disclosed

    Liquidity

    Cash ₹11 crores

    Out of INR 11 crores cash and bank balance, INR 10 crores is in FDRs.

    Guidance & targets

    8
    CategoryTargetPriority
    Capacity
    Recycling Capacity
    68,000 metric tons per annum
    High
    Margin
    EBITDA Margin
    12-12.5%
    Medium
    Revenue
    Battery Waste Management Revenue
    INR 60-70 crores
    Medium
    Revenue
    Nasik Lithium-ion Plant Revenue (from 35% utilization)
    INR 80-100 crores
    Medium
    Capacity Utilization
    Overall Plant Capacity Utilization
    65-70%
    Medium
    Capacity Utilization
    Nasik Lithium-ion Plant Capacity Utilization
    Minimum 35%
    High
    Market Expansion
    International Sourcing Regions for Battery Cells
    Europe, UK, US
    Medium
    Operations
    Li-ion Plant Operational Period
    7 months
    High

    EBITDA Margin Improvement

    Next year/medium term
    Current9.85%
    Target12-12.5%

    Why it matters

    Tracking this will show if operational efficiencies and new plant benefits are translating into improved profitability as guided.

    So, all these put together, we see EBITDA margin only improving from here. Current level is 9.85. We might be probably going to 12 – 12.5 kind of.

    How to verify

    key_financials.metrics[label='EBITDA Margin']

    Risks & concerns

    4
    RiskSeverity

    Margin Compression due to Operational Expenses

    EBITDA and PAT margins declined due to increased logistic costs, expansion-related hiring, R&D, and pre-construction expenses for new facilities. Management expects improvement from operational efficiencies.Management acknowledged

    medium

    Higher Inventory Levels impacting CFO

    Inventory levels increased due to preloading for the new battery plant and bulk corporate discards in Q4, which impacted cash flow. Management anticipates reduced inventory levels going forward.Management acknowledged

    medium

    Regulatory Challenges to EPR Pricing

    Producers have filed writ petitions challenging the government's minimum EPR pricing formula. Management believes the government has strong rationale and will prevail, but acknowledges it's a transition period with resistance.Analyst acknowledged

    medium

    Raw Material Sourcing as a Barrier to Entry

    Raw material sourcing is identified as the biggest challenge in the e-waste recycling business, driving the company's strategy to expand facilities to urban centers and strengthen collection channels.Management acknowledged

    high

    Q&A highlights

    8

    “The decline in EBITDA and PAT margins is primarily attributable to a rise in operational expenses. These include increased logistic costs, expansion related hiring as we are in the process of a robust expansion, investment in R and D's, pre-construction expenses for our upcoming Hyderabad facility, and arranging material for the factory plant... Our inventory levels are higher. There are primary reasons for that. The first I would point out is preloading for battery plant operations... The second reason is bulk corporate discards received during the last quarter.”

    Analyst questioned the reasons for margin compression and increased inventory, which management attributed to strategic expansion costs and Q4 bulk purchases, impacting short-term profitability and cash flow.

    asked by Kaushal Sharma

    2 min read6 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    H2 FY25 Financial Performance and Growth Drivers

    Namo eWaste reported robust financial performance for FY24-25, with revenue growing 50% year-on-year to ₹150.5 crores. EBITDA increased by 29% and PAT by 25% over the same period. This growth was attributed to client diversification, scaling benefits, and increasing demand for ESG-compliant solutions. The company's current recycling capacity exceeds 30,500 metric tons per annum, with plans to expand to 68,000 metric tons by Q3 FY26.

    02

    Regulatory Tailwinds and EPR Framework

    Revised waste management guidelines mandate producers, manufacturers, and importers to recycle a minimum of 60% of their previous year's sales volume, increasing to 70% from FY26. This regulatory shift is a significant structural tailwind for Namo eWaste, compelling OEMs and brands to utilize formal recyclers. The company is well-positioned to capture this demand, especially with India being the third-largest generator of EVs globally, driving lithium-ion battery recycling needs.

    03

    New Facilities and Capacity Expansion

    The company is investing significantly in new facilities. The Nasik plant, dedicated to lithium-ion battery recycling, is expected to cost around ₹15 crores, with ₹11.2 crores funded by IPO proceeds. This plant will handle both refurbishment (20-30%) and black mass production (70%). Additionally, a new e-waste plant in Hyderabad is projected to cost ₹15-18 crores, primarily funded through internal accruals. This expansion aims to increase overall capacity and improve operational efficiency by reducing logistic costs.

    04

    Operational Efficiency and Margin Management

    EBITDA and PAT margins experienced pressure in H2 FY25, with EBITDA margin at 9.85%, down from 11.07% in FY24. This was primarily due to increased operational expenses, including logistic costs which doubled from ₹3.22 crores to ₹6.33 crores, expansion-related hiring, R&D, and pre-construction expenses. Management expects margins to improve to 12-12.5% as new facilities become operational, reducing logistic costs, and working capital from IPO proceeds lowers interest expenses.

    05

    Raw Material Sourcing and Market Share Strategy

    Raw material sourcing is identified as the biggest challenge in the e-waste recycling industry. Namo eWaste's strategy involves expanding its presence in urban centers and strengthening collection channels to secure raw materials. The company estimates its market share in the formal recycling sector to be around 2.5-3% and aims to double this. Current overall plant capacity utilization has increased from 35% in H1 to 55% in H2, with a target to reach 65-70% in the current year (FY26).

    06

    Lithium-ion Battery Recycling Business

    The Nasik lithium-ion battery recycling plant will focus on two key areas: refurbishment/restoration of battery cells and shredding for black mass production. The company anticipates 20-30% of operations will be refurbishment and 70% for black mass. Due to the high CAPEX and risks associated with refining rare earth metals, Namo eWaste plans to export the high-quality black mass to top global players in China and Taiwan. This segment is projected to add ₹60-70 crores in revenue in its first year of operation, with the Nasik plant alone contributing ₹80-100 crores from 35% utilization.

    This is an AI-generated summary of a publicly available earnings call transcript. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an endorsement. inve.money is not a SEBI-registered investment advisor. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.