How to Analyse a Jewellery Stock (SSSG, Stud, Stores)

In the September 2024 quarter, Titan's jewellery business grew handsomely — gold (including coins) up about 30% year-on-year, studded up about 41% (Titan Q2 FY25 investor presentation). A reader watching only the revenue line would have called it a great quarter. Then look one row down: segment EBIT margin fell from 14.1% to 8.7% — a drop of 540 basis points (Titan Q2 FY25 investor presentation). The top line surged and the profitability of every rupee of it nearly halved. (Illustration of how to read the numbers, not a view on the stock.)

That single contrast is the whole subsector in one frame. A jewellery company's revenue can soar for the worst possible reason — a gold-price spike that inflates the value of unchanged volumes — while the margin tells you whether the customer actually bought more, bought richer, or merely paid more for the same chain. Almost everything that decides whether a jewellery stock is a good business hides in the gap between how much it sold and what it earned on the sale. Learn to read that gap and you have read the sector.

This is how to analyse a jewellery company the way a retail analyst does: the handful of operating numbers that decide the outcome, where each one is buried (rarely in the income statement), what "good" looks like, and the one red flag that has fooled more investors than any other — a rising top line that is really just the gold price talking.

A boundary first, said plainly: you cannot model a jeweller's hedge book or its exact making-charge mix from the outside. What you can do is read the direction of SSSG, studded mix, store economics and volume, and check whether management's account of the gold-price effect survives the Q&A. Beyond Titan, Kalyan and Senco, listed names worth running through this same lens include Thangamayil Jewellery, PC Jeweller and P N Gadgil Jewellers.

Why is a jeweller a margin business wearing a revenue costume?

Strip a jewellery retailer down and it does one thing: it buys gold and diamonds, adds design and labour, and sells the finished piece for the metal value plus a making charge. The metal is roughly a pass-through — it flows in and out near cost. The economic engine is the slice on top: the making charge on plain gold, and the much fatter margin on studded (diamond) jewellery.

That framing fixes the beginner's error of cheering revenue. When gold runs from ₹5,000 to ₹6,000 a gram, a jeweller selling the exact same number of grams reports ~20% higher revenue with no extra customers, no extra design, nothing real added. Worse, since the making charge is levied as a percentage of the metal value, the rupee making charge rises too — Senco's managing director spelled it out: "if the gold price rise since we charge the making charge on the value … instead of charging 15%, 16% of ₹1,20,000, I'm charging 15%-16% on ₹1,50,000 or ₹1,60,000. So, due to the gold price rise, the making charge also increases. I'm not just talking about the inventory gain" (Senco Q3 FY26 concall, 13 Feb 2026). The revenue, and even part of the gross profit, can be a gold-price illusion. So the first instinct of a jewellery analyst is to ask of every growth number: how much of this is volume, and how much is the gold price?

The metrics that matter (and where they hide)

Same-store sales growth (SSSG) — the realest growth number there is

SSSG strips out new-store-led growth and tells you how the existing shops are doing — the closest a retailer gets to organic, like-for-like demand. A company can paper over flat demand by opening stores; SSSG refuses to let it.

The catch in jewellery: a high SSSG can be pure gold-price inflation. The sharper management teams therefore quote it two ways. Senco's does exactly this — blended SSSG of 19% in Q1 FY26 (Senco Q1 FY26 concall), but management noted that "if we consider a stable gold price scenario, our SSSG is in the range of 12% to 14%" (Inve data, Q2 FY26). That gap — roughly 19% headline versus 12-14% volume-and-mix — is the gold-price contribution, handed to you. Where to find it: never the income statement. It lives in the concall and the investor PPT, and the best version is the price-neutral one management volunteers (or that an analyst drags out of them). What good looks like: high-single to mid-teens stable-gold SSSG; treat a fat headline SSSG in a gold-spike year with suspicion until you see the volume split.

Studded (diamond) ratio — the margin mix that decides everything

Studded ratio is diamond jewellery as a share of total sales. It is the most important mix number in the sector because studded carries a far higher margin than plain gold — the 540-basis-point swing in Titan's Q2 FY25 margin was driven precisely by a mix shift toward lower-margin gold as gold prices ran (Titan Q2 FY25 investor presentation). A jeweller pushing studded mix up is, all else equal, improving the quality of its earnings even at flat revenue.

The spread between players is wide and revealing. Kalyan's studded ratio runs around 30-32% — management said it should stay "in the 30%, 31%, 32% range" (Kalyan Q4 FY25 concall). Senco, by contrast, ended FY25 at a stud ratio of 10.9% and has been guiding it toward 15% over three to four years (Senco Q4 FY25 concall). That isn't one company being better than the other — it reflects geography and customer (Kalyan's South-and-pan-India studded base versus Senco's East-India gold-heavy one). But it tells you instantly why their margins differ and where each one's margin upside has to come from. Where to find it: concall and PPT, occasionally an annual-report segment note — almost never broken out in the headline P&L. What good looks like: a rising studded ratio, and management treating it as a deliberate lever rather than an accident of the quarter.

Store count, adds, and revenue per store — the expansion engine

Jewellery is a store-led growth story; new showrooms are the second leg after SSSG. But raw store count matters less than two things: the pace and funding of additions, and the revenue per store they settle into. A flurry of openings that dilutes per-store throughput is empty growth.

Scale and approach differ sharply. Titan's Tanishq carried 486 domestic stores after adding 11 net in a single quarter, with CaratLane at 286 stores across 119 cities (Titan Q2 FY25 investor presentation), and guided to 35-40 new Tanishq stores for FY26 (Inve data, Q2 FY26). Kalyan ran a far more aggressive build — 129 new showrooms in FY26 alone, targeting another 150 across Kalyan, Candere and a new regional brand (Kalyan Q4 FY26 concall). Senco sat at 175 showrooms (102 company-operated, 72 franchisee, plus one in Dubai) and adds a steadier 18-20 a year, tilting toward franchisee (Senco Q4 FY25 investor presentation; Senco Q1 FY26 concall). The franchisee-versus-owned split is itself a number to watch — franchisee (FOCO/FOFO) stores are capital-light and protect return on capital but earn the parent a thinner cut. Where to find it: PPT store-count tables and concall guidance; the plan-versus-delivered count is in the concall guidance record. What good looks like: disciplined adds that hold or grow revenue per store, financed without a balance sheet blow-out.

Making charges — the quiet pricing power

Making charges are the labour-and-design fee on top of metal value — the jeweller's true value-add and its clearest pricing power. They flex by product: lightweight, antique and polki pieces carry higher effective making charges; standard machine-made items drag the average down (Senco Q3 FY26 concall). A jeweller that can nudge making charges up — or shift mix toward designs that command them — without losing the customer has a moat the metal can never give it. Senco's management noted consumers will pay "1% to 2% higher making charges" for exclusive, handcrafted, modern designs (Senco Q3 FY26 concall). Where to find it: purely qualitative, purely in the concall — there is no "making charge" line in any statement. What good looks like: stable-to-rising making charges defended by design and brand, not discounted away to chase volume.

The gold-price effect — inventory gain, hedging, and the GML lever

This is the one that fools everyone, so it gets its own discipline. A rising gold price does three things at once: (1) it inflates revenue on flat volume, (2) it produces an inventory gain as old, cheaper stock is sold at new, higher prices — a real but non-repeatable, non-operating boost to margin, and (3) it can depress volume as the metal gets dearer. Watch all three together. Senco's gold volume fell 3% in Q3 FY26 and 10% across 9M FY26 (Senco Q3 FY26 concall) even as rupee revenue grew — the price was doing the lifting while the customer bought fewer grams.

The defence against gold-price whiplash is hedging and the gold metal loan (GML). A jeweller borrows physical gold (a GML) rather than buying it outright, so its inventory cost moves with the price it eventually sells at — a natural hedge — and tops up with MCX futures. Senco runs a board-mandated minimum 50% hedge, lately 55-60%, "considering GML and MCX hedge position" (Senco Q3 FY26 concall); Kalyan's GML interest rate sits around 4-5.5% and swings its finance cost (Kalyan Q1 FY26 / Q4 FY25 concalls). Where to find it: concall and risk notes — never the face of the P&L. What good looks like: a stated, consistent hedging policy and a high GML mix, so that reported margin reflects operations, not a one-way bet on gold. The owner you fear is the one whose great quarter was really an unhedged inventory gain that reverses the moment gold dips.

How do you value a jewellery company?

Jewellers are valued on price-to-earnings, like most consumer-retail names — but the multiple is only as trustworthy as the earnings beneath it, and in this sector earnings are unusually contaminated by the gold price. So the discipline is to value normalised earnings: strip out one-off inventory gains, and judge the P/E against the quality of the growth, not the quantity.

The two levers that justify a premium multiple are the ones above — studded mix and SSSG durability. A jeweller compounding studded ratio upward and posting healthy stable-gold SSSG earns a richer multiple because its earnings are higher-quality and less gold-dependent; one whose growth is mostly gold-price-and-new-stores deserves less, because a gold correction can hand it a flat-to-down year. You can see the earnings power and its swings in the record: Titan's jewellery EBIT margin has been guided at a steady 11-11.5% band for quarters on end (Inve data, Q3 FY25 through Q1 FY26), which is precisely what lets the market underwrite its earnings; a jeweller whose margin lurches with gold has no such anchor and should not be paid like Titan. Read the P/E, then ask what share of last year's profit was inventory gain you should not capitalise.

A worked case: said versus did, on the gold-price line

Take Senco, an East-India jeweller, through FY26 — a year gold ran hard. (Illustration, not a view on the stock; figures from Inve data and the cited concalls.)

Management's account was coherent and, crucially, candid about the gold-price effect rather than hiding behind it. They told you the headline SSSG of 19% in Q1 FY26 (Senco Q1 FY26 concall) was flattered, putting stable-gold SSSG at 12-14% (Inve data, Q2 FY26). They disclosed that gold volume was actually shrinking — down 3% in Q3 and down 10% across nine months (Senco Q3 FY26 concall) — so you knew the rupee growth was price, not grams. And they separated the two sources of margin help explicitly: making charges rising mechanically with gold value, and inventory gain, refusing to let you conflate them (Senco Q3 FY26 concall).

Now the numbers underneath. Consolidated revenue jumped to ₹3,032 crore in Q3 FY26 from ₹2,023 crore a year earlier, with net profit at ₹267 crore against ₹33 crore, and operating margin at 13% versus 4% (Inve data, Q3 FY26 and Q3 FY25). A spectacular quarter on its face. But hold it against what management itself disclosed: volumes were falling, inventory had swelled from ₹2,963 crore to ₹4,602 crore (Senco Q3 FY26 concall) as the company carried more gold at higher prices, and a chunk of that margin leap was inventory gain on stock bought cheaper. The honest read is not "earnings tripled, therefore the business tripled." It is "the gold price did a great deal of this; the operating questions are whether stable-gold SSSG holds, whether studded ratio climbs from 10.9% toward the 15% target, and what the margin looks like when gold stops rising." The management told you where to look. The discipline is taking the hint instead of capitalising the inventory gain.

Said versus did, in one line: Senco guided stud ratio toward 15% "in 3 to 4 years" (Senco Q4 FY25 concall) and reported 10.9% at FY25-end — a commitment whose delivery you watch quarter by quarter, exactly the kind of forward guidance Inve's Promise Tracker pins to the call it was made on and marks as later quarters come in. (A read on how management communicates now, not a lifetime verdict.)

Red flags specific to jewellery

• Revenue up, volume down, and nobody mentions it. The gold-price illusion in its purest form. If a jeweller celebrates rupee growth while grams sold are flat or falling and the concall is quiet on the split, the growth may not be real demand. Senco at least disclosed its 3% / 10% volume decline (Senco Q3 FY26 concall) — silence is the flag.
• Margin spike with no studded-mix improvement. If EBIT margin jumps but studded ratio didn't move, the gain is likely a one-off inventory gain on rising gold — non-repeatable. Capitalise it at your peril.
• Aggressive store adds outrunning the balance sheet. Owned-store expansion is gold-and-working-capital hungry. A build financed by ballooning debt or inventory days (Senco's inventory days rose from 151 to 166 in FY25 — Senco Q4 FY25 concall) needs the per-store economics to justify it.
• No stated hedging policy. A jeweller that won't tell you its hedge ratio or GML mix is running an unhedged bet on gold and calling the result "operating performance." A clear, consistent policy (Senco's 50% floor; Kalyan's GML lever) is a tell of seriousness.
• Discounting making charges to chase volume. A jeweller that defends footfall by giving away its making charge is eroding the only margin gold doesn't dictate.

Frequently asked questions

The discipline comes down to refusing to be impressed by the rupee top line. The metal is a pass-through; the business is the slice on top — making charges, studded mix, and the SSSG of existing stores — and the gold price is forever trying to disguise which of those actually moved. So invert the question you bring to a jeweller's results. Don't ask "did revenue grow?" Ask: if this management were quietly riding the gold price while real volumes and mix stalled, what would the numbers look like — and does this quarter rule that out? Rupee revenue up on falling grams, margin up with flat studded mix, and silence on hedging do not rule it out; they are the pattern itself.

For the same lens applied to a very different balance sheet, see how to analyse an NBFC — there the illusion hides in credit cost; here it hides in the gold price.

And the owner's question, the one to sit with before buying a single share of any jeweller: what must I believe about normalised earnings — stripped of inventory gains, on a gold price that stops rising — for this business to keep compounding? If the honest answer leans on gold going up forever, you have read the costume, not the company.

Related reading

• How to Analyse a Bank Stock (NIM, CASA, GNPA, ROA)
• How to Analyse a Building Products Company (Pipes, Tiles)
• How to Analyse a Cables and Wires Stock