Skip to content

    RBL Bank

    RBLBANKMixed
    Financial Services·18 Jan 2025
    Management Summary

    RBL Bank reported a mixed Q3 FY25, with strong growth in net advances and deposits, particularly in secured retail and granular deposits. However, asset quality challenges persisted in unsecured segments, leading to elevated slippages in JLG and credit cards, and consequently, high provisioning that compressed net profit. Management emphasized proactive risk mitigation, including increased CGFMU cover and aggressive provisioning, aiming for a cleaner balance sheet by Q1 FY26.

    Highlights

    8
    • Net advances grew 13% Y-o-Y to INR90,412 crores.

    • Total deposits increased 15% Y-o-Y to INR106,753 crores, with granular deposits up 20% Y-o-Y.

    • Net Interest Income (NII) was INR1,585 crores, up 3% Y-o-Y but down 2% sequentially.

    • Net Interest Margin (NIM) declined sequentially to 4.9%.

    • Gross NPA stood at 2.92% and Net NPA at 0.53%, with PCR improving to 82.17%.

    • JLG segment saw elevated net slippages of INR521 crores, with collection efficiency improving to 98.4% in December.

    • Net profit for the quarter was INR33 crores, impacted by significant provisioning.

    • CET 1 ratio was 13.7%, affected by a risk weight change for the JLG book from 75% to 125%.

    Concerns

    1
    • Asset Quality Challenges in Unsecured Segments (JLG, Credit Cards)

    What Changed3

    vs Q1 FY26

    Tone shiftGood → MixedGuidance items15 → 13 (-2)Risks discussed3 → 4 (+1)

    Key financials

    Single quarter

    11 metrics
    1. 01Net Advances₹90,412 Cr+13%YoY
    2. 02Total Deposits₹1.07L Cr+15%YoY
    3. 03Net Interest Income₹1,585 Cr+3%YoY
    4. 04NIM4.9%
    5. 05Gross NPA2.9%

    Segment breakdown

    Wholesale Advances
    5% Y-o-Y Growth
    Commercial Banking
    21% Y-o-Y Growth
    Total Retail Advances
    19% Y-o-Y Growth
    Secured Retail Advances
    38% Y-o-Y Growth
    Credit Cards (incl. Personal Loans)
    8% Y-o-Y Growth-2% Q-o-Q Growth
    Retail Wholesale Mix
    61:39 ratio Ratio
    Granular Deposits
    20% Y-o-Y Growth3% Q-o-Q Growth
    CASA Balances (Period Ended)
    12% Y-o-Y Growth-3% Q-o-Q Growth
    Average CASA Balances
    14.0% Y-o-Y Growth4% Q-o-Q Growth
    List

    Guidance & targets

    13
    CategoryTargetPriority
    Asset Quality - JLG Slippages
    Slippage Trend
    broadly similar to Q3
    Medium
    Asset Quality - JLG Slippages
    Slippage Reduction
    material reduction
    High
    Asset Quality - JLG Collection Efficiency
    Current Bucket Collection Efficiency
    99.1%
    High
    Capital Adequacy
    CET 1 Ratio
    up to 13%
    High
    Provisioning Policy - JLG
    Provisioning Level
    high
    High
    Asset Quality - Cards Slippages
    Slippage Normalization
    Q1 to Q2 time frame
    Medium
    Cost of Funds
    Cost of Deposits/Funds
    largely steady in this range
    High
    Cost Management
    Cost-to-Income Ratio
    may trend 1% up or down
    Low
    Margins
    NIM Trend
    trend down a bit
    High
    Margins
    NIM Trajectory
    start moving up
    Medium
    Asset Quality - Unsecured Portfolio
    Net NPAs
    negligible
    High
    Growth
    Overall Growth
    holding at the same level of growth that you have seen in this quarter
    High
    Growth
    Overall Growth
    revise it
    Medium

    Risks & concerns

    6
    RiskSeverity

    Asset Quality Challenges in Unsecured Segments (JLG, Credit Cards)

    Elevated net slippages in JLG (INR521 crores) and credit cards (INR533 crores), impacting NII and requiring significant provisioning.Management acknowledged

    high

    Competitive Deposit Environment & Tight Liquidity

    General competitive dynamics for deposits and relatively tight liquidity conditions despite CRR easing.Management acknowledged

    medium

    NIM Compression

    NIM declined sequentially to 4.9% due to interest reversals and lower JLG disbursals, with Q4 margins expected to trend down.Management acknowledged

    medium

    Overleveraged Customer Profile in MFI

    Approximately 10-11% of MFI borrowers have 4+ lenders, and ~25-26% are overleveraged from others, prompting more stringent underwriting.Management acknowledged

    medium

    Areas of Evasion(2)

    • FY26 guidance
    • Specific split of credit cost for BFL vs non-BFL cards

    Q&A highlights

    3

    “Our assessment is that from next month onwards, or by March, definitely, we will be in a position to reach the current bucket efficiency of 99.1%... the trending which we are seeing it from December onwards, will show us a lesser slippages from the month of March onwards.”

    Provides a clear timeline and specific target for collection efficiency improvement, directly linking it to future slippage reduction, which is a major concern for the JLG portfolio.

    asked by Rikin Shah

    3 min read7 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    Q3 FY25 Financial Performance Overview

    RBL Bank reported net advances growth of 13% year-on-year to INR90,412 crores, driven by a 38% Y-o-Y increase in secured retail advances and 21% Y-o-Y growth in commercial banking. Total deposits grew 15% Y-o-Y to INR106,753 crores, with granular deposits increasing 20% Y-o-Y. Net Interest Income (NII) was INR1,585 crores, up 3% Y-o-Y but down 2% sequentially, while Net Interest Margin (NIM) declined sequentially to 4.9% due to interest reversals and lower JLG disbursals.

    02

    Asset Quality and Provisioning Strategy

    The bank's asset quality saw Gross NPA at 2.92% and Net NPA at 0.53%, with the Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) improving to 82.17% from approximately 73% last quarter. Elevated net slippages were observed in the JLG segment at INR521 crores and in credit cards at INR533 crores. Management adopted an aggressive provisioning strategy, including an additional INR414 crores for JLG NPAs, bringing JLG GNPA coverage to 85%, and utilizing one-off📎 gains (INR144 crores from stake sale, INR150 crores tax write-back) for provisioning.

    03

    JLG Portfolio Management and Outlook

    The JLG segment experienced significant slippages, but collection efficiency improved to 98.4% in December 2024 from 97.5% in September 2024. Management expects JLG slippages to be broadly similar in Q4 FY25 but anticipates a material reduction from Q1 FY26 onwards, driven by sustained improvement in collection trends. Proactive risk mitigation includes increasing CGFMU cover for incremental JLG disbursals to approximately 42% (from 25% in Q2).

    04

    Credit Cards Performance and Normalization

    Credit card advances, including personal loans, grew 8% Y-o-Y but declined 2% sequentially. Slippages in the cards book were INR533 crores, down from INR606 crores last quarter. Management expects slippage trends to continue decreasing, with normalization anticipated in the Q1-Q2 FY26 timeframe. The bank maintains an aggressive provisioning policy for credit cards, taking 100% provisioning in 120 days, aiming for a clean slate by FY26.

    05

    Capital Adequacy and Growth Strategy

    The bank's CET 1 ratio stood at 13.7%, impacted by a risk weight change for the JLG book from 75% to 125%. Despite this, management expressed confidence in maintaining capital adequacy, stating there is no need for a capital raise in the foreseeable future and expecting capital burn to be less than 10 basis points per quarter. Growth will be driven by wholesale and secured retail businesses, with unsecured lending moderating as a proportion.

    06

    Cost Management and Profitability Outlook

    The cost-to-income ratio improved to 62.5% from 64.2% last quarter. Management is focused on cost control through consolidations, process simplifications, and system improvements, aiming to keep operating expenses at a similar level, excluding capex-related depreciation. Despite high provisioning impacting Q3 net profit to INR33 crores, management stated it is 'highly unlikely' to report a net loss in Q4, intending to utilize contingency provisions (INR273 crores) and PPOP to minimize carry-forward baggage.

    07

    MFIN Guardrails and Underwriting Standards

    RBL Bank has proactively adopted more stringent underwriting standards for its MFI portfolio than the MFIN guidelines, including assessing the family as a unit, not lending to customers with even 1 DPD in their own book or outside, and adhering to the INR2 lakh limit. While the MFIN guideline on the number of institutions has been pushed to April 1st, the bank believes its proactive measures will improve portfolio quality and mitigate risks from overleveraged customers.

    This is an AI-generated summary of a publicly available earnings call transcript. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an endorsement. inve.money is not a SEBI-registered investment advisor. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.