Skip to content
    EXC
    Earnings call· Mar 2026(Q1 FY26)

    EXELON Q1 FY26 earnings call EXC

    May 6, 2026 Source

    Executive summary

    Exelon Q1 FY26 — On track; rebalances capital toward transmission amid affordability pressure

    A 'different plan for a different moment': Exelon is pulling back Pennsylvania and Maryland distribution spend under intensifying affordability and regulatory pressure and redeploying into fast-growing transmission and data-center interconnection. Management leans on cost discipline and portfolio diversification to hold earnings on track despite a withdrawn PECO rate case and an unresolved regional generation shortage it is actively advocating to fix.

    Highlights

    5
    • Adjusted operating EPS of $0.91, ahead of internal indications on net favorable weather and timing-related items

    • Reaffirmed 2026 adjusted operating EPS guidance of $2.81-$2.91 and long-term 5%-7% earnings growth outlook near the top end through 2029

    • Maintained 7.9% annualized rate base growth on a revised $41.7B four-year capital plan, with transmission rate base growing 16% through 2029

    • Delivered ~$1 billion in customer savings over the past year while sustaining top-quartile reliability (ComEd top decile)

    • Secured ~$1 billion of collateral via FERC-approved transmission security agreements from data center customers

    Concerns

    5
    • PECO withdrew its recently filed electric and gas rate cases on affordability/timing grounds; PECO is on negative outlook and under review for a downgrade

    • Revised plan embeds $1.1 billion of PECO and BGE distribution project deferrals and reductions

    • Q1 adjusted EPS of $0.91 fell from $0.92 a year ago, hurt by ComEd timing (-$0.04), higher interest expense (-$0.02) and higher credit loss (-$0.01)

    • Pennsylvania Governor's letter signals risk of lower allowed ROE and equity layer in future rate cases

    • Mid-Atlantic residential supply costs up 80%+ over five years, with PJM warning of 2028 reliability/blackout risk

    Guidance & targets

    14
    CategoryTargetConfidence
    Full-year 2026 adjusted operating EPS
    $2.81-$2.91 per share
    high materiality
    High
    Long-term adjusted operating earnings growth (2025-2029)
    near the top end of 5% to 7%
    high materiality
    High
    Annualized regulatory rate base growth (2026-2029)
    7.9%
    high materiality
    High
    Transmission rate base growth through 2029
    16%
    high materiality
    High
    Adjusted O&M growth through 2029
    no more than 2%
    medium materiality
    High
    Incremental O&M savings in 2027
    $350 million
    high materiality
    High
    Full-year 2026 capital expenditure
    approximately $10 billion
    high materiality
    High
    Four-year capital plan (2026-2029)
    $41.7 billion
    high materiality
    High
    Full-year 2026 consolidated ROE
    9% to 10%
    medium materiality
    High
    Consolidated credit metrics (FFO/debt) target
    approximately 14%
    high materiality
    High
    Second-quarter 2026 earnings as % of full-year midpoint
    approximately 15%
    low materiality
    Medium
    First-half 2026 earnings as % of full year
    47%
    low materiality
    Medium
    Incremental transmission investment opportunity beyond the plan
    $12 billion to $17 billion
    medium materiality
    Medium
    Pepco Maryland base rate case revenue requirement (requested)
    $119.9 million
    medium materiality
    Medium

    Operational metrics

    5
    Adjusted operating EPS
    $0.91vs $0.92 in Q1 FY25
    Q1 FY26

    Non-GAAP. Exceeded expectations on net favorable weather and timing-related items; management targets FY26 midpoint or better.

    Customer savings delivered
    approximately $1 billion
    trailing 12 months

    Delivered while providing best-in-industry reliability with nearly flat costs.

    Long-term debt financing completed
    $2.3 billion (43% of plan)
    2026 year-to-date

    Materially derisks the go-forward financing plan; strong demand and attractive pricing.

    Equity financing progress
    $3.4 billion total need; ~37% progressed~40% of prior plan's incremental capital; <2% of annual market cap
    2026-2029 plan

    Balanced funding strategy alongside $21.8B internal cash, $13.1B utility debt, $3.4B holdco debt.

    Grid interconnection queue
    811 new generation projects / 20 GW appliedqueue reopened
    as of last week (Q1 FY26 call)

    Cited by Colette Honorable; reflects PJM interconnection reform, not Exelon-owned generation (Exelon is a pure T&D utility).

    Industry KPIs

    4
    MetricValueDetails
    Ffo to debtapproximately 14%%
    Regulatory rate base growth7.9%%
    Rto market structure reviewPJM capacity market and interconnection queue reforms ongoing
    Contracted large load capacity esas loasapproximately $1 billion of collateral securedUSD collateral

    Deals & partnerships

    2
    Invenergypartnership / joint competitive transmission bidapproximately $1.9 billion (total transmission capital, jointly pursued)

    Bids submitted in February 2026; management said it is too early to comment on potential outcomes.

    Data center customers (unnamed)customer transmission security agreementsapproximately $1 billion of collateral secured

    FERC-approved transmission security agreements; designed to ensure the data center pipeline is backed and protect existing customers.

    Capital programs

    3
    Revised four-year capital plan (2026-2029)underway / revised$41.7 billion
    Period spend: approximately $10 billion in 2026
    Funding: $21.8B internally generated cash flow; $13.1B utility debt; $3.4B holding company debt; $3.4B equity (ATM forwards)
    Start: 2026

    Benefit: 7.9% annualized rate base growth; transmission rate base growth of 16% through 2029

    Rebalanced: $1.1B of PECO and BGE distribution deferrals and reductions offset by $1.5B incremental transmission investment for project realignment and data-center interconnection.

    $350 million O&M cost-savings program (2027)announced$350 million incremental savings
    Start: 2027

    Benefit: Supports 'no more than 2%' adjusted O&M growth target through 2029

    Tied to work no longer pursued; from accelerating AI/technology transformation, IT project prioritization, focused community investments, reduced outside contractors, managed hiring, and a targeted voluntary separation program later this year.

    MISO tranche 2.1 Illinois competitive transmission bidsannounced — bids submitted, outcomes pendingapproximately $1.9 billion total transmission capital
    Start: February 2026 (bids submitted)

    Benefit: Two Illinois transmission projects

    Pursued jointly with Invenergy; excluded from the $12-17B upside range; two additional bids expected later in the month across PJM and other ISOs.

    Risks & headwinds

    6
    Pennsylvania regulatory pressure — risk of lower allowed ROE and equity layer in future rate casesfuture rate case filings (PA has a 9-month process)

    Governor's letter cites 'justifiable returns'; PECO withdrew electric and gas rate cases; potential returns/equity-cap below U.S. state averages

    Mitigation: Build evidentiary record justifying fair returns; $350M cost reductions; portfolio diversification; work collaboratively with governor and commission

    PECO credit downgrade risknear-term

    PECO on negative outlook and on review for a downgrade

    Mitigation: Maintain ~14% consolidated credit metric target above downgrade thresholds; diversified platform; balanced financing

    Regional generation supply shortage / reliability2028/2029 delivery year (PJM warned since 2024)

    Customers paid $32 billion for PJM capacity over two years while supply declined 1.2 GW; CRA estimated $9.6-$20 billion of foregone customer savings in the 2028/2029 delivery year; ~85% outage-risk reduction foregone

    Mitigation: Advocacy for utility-owned generation (MD HB-1561, PA HB-1272/SB-897), incremental transmission, PJM reforms, data-center transmission security agreements

    Affordability pressure on ratesongoing

    Mid-Atlantic residential supply costs up 80%+ over the past five years

    Mitigation: ~$1 billion in customer savings delivered; distribution project deferrals; disciplined cost management keeping costs nearly flat

    Interest rate / rising financing cost riskover the planning period

    -$0.02 EPS from higher interest expense at Corporate and PECO in Q1; rate case cites incremental financing costs

    Mitigation: Interest rate hedging strategy; 43% ($2.3B) of 2026 debt financing already completed; forward-priced ATM equity

    Data-center / large-load concentration riskover the planning period

    Not quantified in GW; pipeline backed by ~$1 billion of collateral

    Mitigation: FERC-approved transmission security agreements requiring collateral before incremental transmission investment

    Q&A highlights

    8

    What in the Pennsylvania environment made withdrawing the PECO case worthwhile when gas peers appear fine and one has a black-box settlement?

    Butler said the decision was timing-driven, based on stakeholder conversations asking Exelon to partner on affordability; he declined to conflate it with peers' cases and affirmed PECO still needs future investment, to be pursued collaboratively and time-appropriately.

    our decision to remove the Pennsylvania filing was based on conversations we had with a variety of stakeholders

    asked by Shahriar Pourreza · answered by Calvin Butler

    4 min read7 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    A 'different plan for a different moment' — capital rebalance

    Exelon revised its four-year capital plan to $41.7 billion (nearly $10 billion in 2026), pulling back $1.1 billion of PECO and BGE distribution project deferrals and reductions while adding $1.5 billion of incremental transmission investment to support project realignment and data center interconnection. Despite the rebalance, annualized rate base growth is maintained at 7.9%, with transmission rate base now growing 16% through 2029. Management framed this as a deliberate response to a shifted energy market with significant load growth and inadequate supply, emphasizing size, scale, diversification and discipline. It reaffirmed 2026 EPS guidance of $2.81-$2.91 and long-term 5%-7% growth near the top end.

    02

    Pennsylvania regulatory environment and PECO rate case withdrawal

    PECO withdrew its recently filed electric and gas rate cases, a timing-based decision grounded in customer affordability and stakeholder feedback, without changing its long-term infrastructure commitment. The Pennsylvania Governor's letter emphasized affordability and set out three principles for future cases: pursuing the most cost-effective forms of capital, transparency in ratemaking, and 'justifiable returns.' Management said it had no concern with those principles and will build an evidentiary record within Pennsylvania's nine-month process. A leadership transition occurred at PECO, with Michael Innocenzo (COO, prior PECO CEO 2018-2024) stepping in as Interim President and CEO while Dave Vohos moved to an advisory role.

    03

    Transmission growth and competitive bids

    Exelon is leaning into transmission where reliability and resiliency needs are accelerating. In February it submitted competitive bids for two Illinois transmission opportunities in the MISO tranche 2.1 window, representing approximately $1.9 billion of total transmission capital pursued jointly with Invenergy, with two additional bids expected later in the month across PJM and other ISOs. The $12-17 billion upside opportunity range outside the planning period was maintained and excludes the MISO bids and any solar/storage opportunities. Management noted it does not discuss generation or transmission opportunities until agreements are signed.

    04

    Generation supply shortage and PJM advocacy

    Management repeatedly stressed that affordability cannot be solved without addressing the underlying generation shortage. Mid-Atlantic residential supply costs have risen up to 80% or more over five years, and PJM has warned of 2028 reliability risk since 2024 without meaningful new supply progress. Over the last two years customers paid $32 billion for PJM capacity while supply declined 1.2 gigawatts. Charles River Associates estimated utility-supported generation could have saved PJM customers $9.6-$20 billion in the 2028/2029 delivery year while cutting outage risk ~85%. Exelon supports utility-owned generation (e.g. Maryland HB-1561, HB-1272/SB-897 in PA) alongside transmission and PJM reforms. Colette Honorable noted PJM reopened the queue with 811 projects (20 GW) applied, though only 19% historically reach operation and 54 GW cleared remains delayed by siting, permitting and supply chain.

    05

    Cost discipline and O&M savings program

    Exelon is targeting no more than 2% adjusted O&M growth through 2029 after nearly flat expense growth from 2024 to 2026, and identified another $350 million of savings in 2027 tied to work it will no longer pursue. Levers include accelerating AI and technology transformation, prioritizing high-impact IT projects, focusing community investments, reducing outside contractors, a managed hiring process and a targeted voluntary separation program later this year. Management characterized the savings as largely sustainable and system-wide rather than sacrificing reliability or safety, and delivered approximately $1 billion in customer savings over the past year.

    06

    Balance sheet and financing strategy

    Exelon completed approximately 43% ($2.3 billion) of planned long-term debt financing for the year, executing all expected corporate and Pepco Holdings debt transactions and materially derisking the plan. The revised $41.7 billion plan through 2029 will be funded with ~$21.8 billion internally generated cash flow, $13.1 billion utility debt, $3.4 billion holding company debt and $3.4 billion equity — the equity being ~40% of the incremental plan and less than 2% of annual market cap. Roughly 37% of equity needs are progressed, with all $850 million of 2026 needs and over $400 million of 2027 priced via forward ATM contracts. Credit metrics are targeted at ~14% at Moody's and S&P.

    07

    Regulatory case calendar — Pepco Maryland and Delmarva

    Pepco Maryland is pursuing a traditional base rate case requesting a $119.9 million revenue requirement to recover critical infrastructure (e.g. the White Plant substation in Montgomery County, which removed over 16 miles of overhead lines) and higher financing costs; evidentiary hearings were held last week with a final order expected in August. In Delaware, Delmarva Power's electric base rate case is on schedule with intervener testimony due end of October and interim rates expected to take effect in July. Separately, Maryland's Utility Relief Act passed the legislature awaiting Governor Moore's signature, though management noted it does not address the supply/demand imbalance.

    AI-generated summary of the company’s earnings call. Not investment advice.