Inve US ▾
FIFICO

Fair Isaac (FICO) Q2 FY26 earnings call: guidance and Q&A

Earnings call· Mar 2026 (Q2 FY26)· Information Technology· Apr 28, 2026

Source: earnings call transcript

Executive summary

FICO Q2 FY26 — Scores surge 60% on mortgage; FY26 guidance raised to $2.45B

FICO's quarter was powered by mortgage-driven Scores strength and a repriced 10T rollout aimed at neutralizing VantageScore's new conforming-market access on both price and predictiveness. The software story is bifurcating — FICO Platform compounds via land-and-expand while legacy non-platform runs off. Management raised full-year guidance and leaned into record buybacks, signaling confidence its moat holds through GSE credit-score modernization.

Highlights

5
  • Total revenue $692M, up 39% YoY; non-GAAP EPS $12.50, up 60%; GAAP EPS $11.14, up 69%

  • Scores segment revenue $475M, up 60% YoY, with mortgage originations revenue up 127% and B2B revenue up 72%

  • FICO Platform ARR $349M, up 49% YoY (mid-30% range excluding migrations); platform revenue up 54% YoY, platform NRR 136%

  • Raised FY26 guidance to $2.45B revenue (+23%), non-GAAP EPS $40.45 (+35%), GAAP EPS $35.60 (+34%)

  • Record $605M share repurchase (484,000 shares); trailing-twelve-month free cash flow $867M, up 28%

Concerns

5
  • Non-platform ARR fell 8% to $440M and non-platform revenue declined 12%; non-platform NRR only 90% and blended dollar-based net retention just 109%

  • Software segment grew only 7% YoY; on-premises revenue declined 4%; software ACV bookings just $28M in the quarter

  • VantageScore now approved for conforming mortgage market, with unresolved FHFA/LLPA 'gaming' risk in a two-score system

  • Total debt $3.64B at 5.5% weighted-average rate against only $272M cash; interest expense guided to trend up

  • Mortgage now 63% of Scores revenue, concentrating results in a rate-sensitive, volume-uncertain vertical

Guidance & targets

CategoryTargetConfidence
Full-year FY26 revenue
$2.45 billion
high materiality
High
Full-year FY26 GAAP net income
$825 million
high materiality
High
Full-year FY26 GAAP EPS
$35.60
high materiality
High
Full-year FY26 non-GAAP net income
$946 million
high materiality
High
Full-year FY26 non-GAAP EPS
$40.45
high materiality
High
Full-year FY26 operating tax rate
25% to 26%
low materiality
Medium
Full-year FY26 effective tax rate
around 24%
low materiality
Medium
Operating expense trajectory (H2 FY26)
trend modestly upward from Q2 run rate
low materiality
Medium
Interest expense trajectory (H2 FY26)
trend modestly upward from Q2 run rate
low materiality
Medium
Software ACV bookings (H2 vs H1 FY26)
H2 bookings expected to exceed H1
medium materiality
Medium
FY26 Scores volume / VantageScore share-loss assumption
no loss of volume to VantageScore assumed in FY26; conservative score volumes
high materiality
Medium

Segment performance

SegmentRevenueYoYQoQMargin
Scores
B2B growth driven by higher mortgage-origination score unit price plus higher mortgage-origination volume; B2C driven by indirect channel partners. Auto decelerated on tougher comps and mix shift to lower unit-cost tiers.
B2B scores revenue: +72% YoYB2C scores revenue: +5% YoYMortgage originations revenue: +127% YoYMortgage originations % of B2B revenue: 72%Mortgage originations % of total Scores revenue: 63%Auto originations revenue: +13% YoYCredit card / personal loan / other originations revenue: +6% YoYB2C growth streak: 6th straight quarter
$475M+60%——
Software
Platform revenue growth driven by land-and-expand; non-platform decline driven by migrations. FY26 guidance reflects lower point-in-time (license) revenue on fewer non-platform renewal opportunities. (ARR splits captured in subsector_kpis.)
Platform revenue: +54% YoYNon-platform revenue: -12% YoYSaaS revenue: +19% YoYOn-premises revenue: -4% YoY
$217M+7%——
Geographic revenue mix
Complete geographic mix as stated for Q2 FY26; heavily Americas-concentrated.
Americas (North America + Latin America): 90% of total revenueEMEA: 7% of total revenueAsia Pacific: 3% of total revenue
————

FICO operating KPIs by quarter

FICO operating KPIs stated on its earnings calls, by fiscal quarter
KPI Dec 2024 Q1 FY25 Mar 2025 Q2 FY25 Dec 2025 Q1 FY26This call Mar 2026 Q2 FY26 Jun 2026 Q3 FY26Change vs prior quarter
Net revenue retention rate
105% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8, was 105% with platform NRR at 112% and non-platform at 100%. Source: earnings call transcript
102% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8 was 102% with platform NRR at 110% and non-platform at 96%. Source: earnings call transcript
103% Our dollar-based net retention rate in the quarter was 103%, platform NRR was 122%, while our non-platform NRR was 91%. Source: earnings call transcript
109% Our dollar-based net retention rate in the quarter was 109%. Source: earnings call transcript
109% Our dollar-based net retention rate in the quarter was 109%. Source: earnings call transcript
0 pt
Net revenue retention rate Platform
112% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8, was 105% with platform NRR at 112% and non-platform at 100%. Source: earnings call transcript
110% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8 was 102% with platform NRR at 110% and non-platform at 96%. Source: earnings call transcript
122% Our dollar-based net retention rate in the quarter was 103%, platform NRR was 122%, while our non-platform NRR was 91%. Source: earnings call transcript
136% Platform NRR was 136%, while our non-platform NRR was 90%. Source: earnings call transcript
148% Platform NRR was 148%, while our non-platform NRR was 82%. Source: earnings call transcript
+12 pt
Net revenue retention rate Non-platform
100% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8, was 105% with platform NRR at 112% and non-platform at 100%. Source: earnings call transcript
96% Total NRR for the quarter shown on Page 8 was 102% with platform NRR at 110% and non-platform at 96%. Source: earnings call transcript
91% Our dollar-based net retention rate in the quarter was 103%, platform NRR was 122%, while our non-platform NRR was 91%. Source: earnings call transcript
90% Platform NRR was 136%, while our non-platform NRR was 90%. Source: earnings call transcript
82% Platform NRR was 148%, while our non-platform NRR was 82%. Source: earnings call transcript
-8 pt
ACV bookings
$21.2M ACV bookings for the quarter were $21.2 million compared to $18.3 million in the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$21.8M ACV bookings for the quarter were $21.8 million compared to $16.8 million in the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$38M Our software ACV bookings for the quarter were a record of $38 million, as shown on Page 15 of the presentation. Source: earnings call transcript
$28M Our software ACV bookings for the quarter were $28 million, as shown on Page 18 of our presentation. Source: earnings call transcript
$29M Our software ACV bookings for the quarter were $29 million, as shown on Page 19 of the presentation. Source: earnings call transcript
+3.6%
Annual recurring revenue (ARR) Software
$729M Our total Software ARR was $729 million, a 6% increase over the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$715M Our total software ARR was $715 million, a 3% increase over the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$766M Our total software ARR, as shown on Page 16, was $766 million, a 5% increase over the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$789M Our total software ARR, as shown on Page 19, was $789 million, a 10% increase over the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
$816M Our total software ARR, as shown on Page 20, was $816 million, a 10% increase over the prior year. Source: earnings call transcript
+3.4%
Annual recurring revenue (ARR) Platform
$228M Platform ARR was $228 million, representing 31% of our total Q1 '25 ARR and was up 28% and up from 28% of total Q1 '24 ARR. Source: earnings call transcript
$235M Platform ARR was $235 million, representing 33% of our total Q2 '25 ARR, up from 29% of total Q2 '24 ARR. Source: earnings call transcript
$303M Platform ARR was $303 million, representing 40% of our total Q1 '26 ARR. Source: earnings call transcript
$349M Platform ARR was $349 million, representing 44% of our total Q2 '26 ARR. Source: earnings call transcript
$413M Platform ARR grew 62% versus the prior year to $413 million and represented 51% of our total Q3 '26 ARR, while non-platform declined 17% to $403 million for the quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
+18.3%
Annual recurring revenue (ARR) Non-platform
$501M Platform ARR grew 20% versus the prior year, while nonplatform grew 1% to $501 million this quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
$480M Platform ARR grew 17% versus the prior year, while non-platform declined 3% to $480 million this quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
$463M Platform ARR grew 33% versus the prior year, while non-platform declined 8% to $463 million this quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
$440M Platform ARR grew 49% versus the prior year, while nonplatform declined 8% to $440 million this quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
$403M Platform ARR grew 62% versus the prior year to $413 million and represented 51% of our total Q3 '26 ARR, while non-platform declined 17% to $403 million for the quarter. Source: earnings call transcript
-8.4%
Customers Platform——
150+ We now have over 150 customers on FICO platform with more than half leveraging FICO platform for multiple use cases. Source: earnings call transcript
150+ There are over 150 clients globally using the FICO Platform across multiple connected use cases to power their customer experience, business critical operations, risk management and fraud monitoring and prevention. Source: earnings call transcript
——

Operating figures the company stated on at least two of the calls shown, checked against each call's transcript. Click a figure to read the sentence. A dash means it was not stated that quarter.

Orderbook & backlog

Total software ARR (forward-demand proxy) $789M March 31, 2026 (Q2 FY26)

+10% YoY

FICO discloses no RPO/backlog; ARR is the recurring forward-demand measure. Platform ARR $349M (+49% YoY, ~44% of total; mid-30% ex Q1 liquid-credit and Q2 CCS migrations); non-platform ARR $440M (-8% YoY). Complementary flow measure: software ACV bookings $28M in Q2, trailing-12-month ACV bookings $126M (+36% YoY), with H2 bookings expected to exceed H1.

Product announcements

ProductTypeDetails
FICO Score 10Tmilestone
Cash Flow UltraFICO Score (next-generation)roadmap
FICO Platform (agentic-by-design)milestone
FICO World 2026milestone

Deals & partnerships

Plaid Strategic partnership / product distribution

Strategic partner for bringing the next-generation Cash Flow UltraFICO Score to market; testing actively underway alongside FICO mortgage direct-licensing reseller partners.

Top-5 mortgage score resellers (3 of 5 signed; 2 in discussion) Reseller / direct-licensing partnership

FICO expects all 5 major resellers to provide the direct-license program; remaining gate is FHFA approval for resellers to calculate the score (math identical to bureau calculation).

Risks & headwinds

VantageScore approved for conforming mortgage; potential share loss via dual-pull/gaming in a two-score system FY26 and beyond; contingent on FHFA selling guidelines and LLPA grids

Management estimates VantageScore paid share ~2%; guidance assumes no volume loss to VantageScore in FY26; ~20 mortgages securitized with VantageScore (<0.1%)

Mitigation:10T repriced to $0.99 (price parity), more predictive, qualifies 5% more borrowers; management expects lenders to pull both scores (share loss but not volume loss)

Non-platform / legacy software runoff ongoing

Non-platform ARR -8% to $440M; non-platform revenue -12%; non-platform NRR 90%; blended dollar-based net retention 109%

Mitigation:Offset by FICO Platform ARR +49% and platform NRR 136%; management not forcing migration and renews profitable legacy contracts

Lower point-in-time (on-premises license) revenue in FY26 FY26

Fewer non-platform license renewal opportunities vs prior year; on-prem revenue -4% in Q2

Mitigation:Reflected in full-year revenue guidance

LLPA-grid pricing/gaming risk from differing default and prepayment risk between scores pending FHFA/GSE selling guidelines and LLPA grid design

Unquantified; VantageScore data only goes back to 2013, untested through a full credit cycle

Mitigation:Management expects investors to demand a premium for VantageScore's cycle-untested risk, favoring FICO; expects both scores pulled if gaming persists

Rising debt and interest expense H2 FY26

Total debt $3.64B at 5.5% weighted-average rate; $272M cash; interest expense to trend modestly upward

Mitigation:Strong free cash flow ($214M Q2, $867M TTM) and unutilized revolver

Mortgage volume concentration / macro sensitivity ongoing

Mortgage = 63% of Scores revenue and 72% of B2B; Q2 volume beat driven by a temporary rate dip not expected to persist

Mitigation:Conservative score-volume assumptions embedded in guidance

Auto originations deceleration ongoing

Auto originations revenue +13% (down from prior pace) on tougher comps and mix shift to lower unit-cost pricing tiers

Direct Licensing Program timing dependent on FHFA sign-off near-term, date unspecified

Unquantified; go-live has slipped past management's earlier internal expectation

Mitigation:Management says it is close; math identical to bureau calculation reduces approval risk

Q&A highlights

What is the philosophy behind moving the 10T mortgage price to $0.99 upfront?

Lansing framed it as a continuation of a multi-year shift to a performance model that spreads IP monetization across the value chain rather than concentrating cost upfront, and as classic new-product pricing to encourage widespread 10T adoption at parity with VantageScore.

“In this most recent move to $0.99 plus a $65 funding fee, the idea was to encourage adoption of FICO 10T because we think that the most powerful thing that we can do is really get FICO 10T established.”

asked by Jason Haas · answered by William Lansing

4 min read 7 chapters

Detailed narrative

Scores segment powered by mortgage originations

Scores revenue was $475M, up 60% YoY, with B2B up 72% on higher mortgage-origination score unit price plus higher mortgage-origination volume. Mortgage originations revenue jumped 127% YoY and now represents 72% of B2B revenue and 63% of total Scores revenue.

Management attributed the volume beat to a temporary dip in interest rates that lifted originations, consistent with bureau commentary, but reiterated a conservative volume posture for the balance of the year. Auto originations grew 13% (decelerating on tougher comps and mix shift toward lower unit-cost tiers) and card/personal-loan/other originations grew 6%.

B2C revenue rose 5%, its sixth straight quarter of growth, driven by indirect channel partners.

FICO Score 10T pricing strategy and VantageScore competition

FICO cut its 10T mortgage direct-licensing price from $4.95/score plus a $33 funding fee to $0.99/score plus a $65 funding fee, framed as spreading IP monetization across the value chain and encouraging widespread 10T adoption ahead of GSE acceptance. Lansing stressed 10T is at price parity with VantageScore ($0.99) while remaining more predictive, qualifying 5% more borrowers via rental/utility data.

Management pegged VantageScore's paid market share at roughly 2%, arguing most VantageScores are bundled free by bureaus and unpaid. In a two-score conforming system, management expects some lenders to pull both scores, calling that share loss but not volume loss for FICO, and flagged unresolved LLPA-grid 'gaming' risk tied to differing default/prepayment risk (VantageScore data only goes back to 2013, untested through a full cycle).

Direct Licensing Program and reseller readiness

The 10T direct-license program is nearly live: 3 of the top 5 major resellers are signed, with the other 2 in deep discussion and expected to join. The key remaining gate is FHFA sign-off allowing resellers to calculate the score (management sees no issue since the math is identical).

Management said timing has run longer than the market's optimistic expectations but that they are close. Separately, the historical FICO 10T data sits with the FHFA/GSEs for release (timing uncertain, expected over the summer), and the early-adopter program added 11 lenders to reach 55, representing >$495B of annual serviceable originations (2025 HMDA) and >$1.6T of eligible servicing.

Software: FICO Platform growth vs non-platform runoff

Software revenue was $217M, up 7%, with SaaS +19% and platform revenue +54%, offset by on-prem -4% and non-platform revenue -12%. Platform ARR reached $349M (+49% YoY, ~44% of total software ARR of $789M), or mid-30% growth excluding one-time Q1 liquid-credit and Q2 CCS migrations; non-platform ARR fell 8% to $440M on migrations, end-of-life products, and usage declines.

Platform NRR was 136% versus non-platform 90% (blended 109%). Management said it is not forcing legacy-to-platform migration, is happy to renew profitable legacy contracts, and views platform and legacy as roughly in balance. FY26 revenue guidance reflects lower point-in-time (license) revenue on fewer non-platform renewal opportunities.

AI positioning and the regulatory moat

Management argued AI is unlikely to displace the FICO score in underwriting near-term because fair-lending law demands explainability, model governance, and non-discrimination that black-box AI cannot deliver — citing the CFPB's shutdown of Upstart's approach and FICO's 32 consumer reason codes.

FICO holds 137 AI-based patents (including blockchain for traceable, explainable decisioning) and positions FICO Platform as 'agentic-by-design' for regulated financial services, recognized as a leader by Gartner, Forrester and IDC, with over 150 global platform clients across connected use cases.

Management said its latest score is more predictive than VantageScore and any other score, with the only caveat being lender proprietary scores built on top of FICO.

Capital allocation and balance sheet

FICO repurchased 484,000 shares for $605M — its largest quarterly dollar buyback ever — at an average $1,251, and bought a further $170M (164,000 shares at $1,040 avg) since April 1, backed by a new $1.5B board authorization, strong FCF ($214M in Q2; $867M TTM, +28%) and an unutilized revolver.

Lansing called current levels an opportunistic time to lean in. The balance sheet carried $272M cash and $3.64B total debt at a 5.5% weighted-average rate (93% senior notes), including a March $1B senior-notes issuance due 2034 that funded redemption of $400M of notes due in May, plus $265M drawn on the revolver.

Raised FY26 guidance and conservative assumptions

After a strong first half, FICO raised full-year guidance to $2.45B revenue (+23%), $825M GAAP net income ($35.60 EPS, +34%), and $946M non-GAAP net income ($40.45 EPS, +35%). Guidance assumes conservative score volumes, no volume loss to VantageScore this fiscal year, and builds in some revenue lag if the performance-based direct-license model goes live (pushing funding-fee revenue from late FY26 into early FY27).

Management characterized incremental Scores marketing and FICO World costs as not material to the model.

Summary of the company's earnings call; see how call summaries are prepared. Not investment advice.