Skip to content
    JPM
    Earnings call· Dec 2025(Q4 FY25)

    JPMORGAN CHASE & CO JPM

    Jan 13, 2026 Source

    Executive summary

    JPMorgan Chase Q4 FY25 — Strong Performance Driven by Markets and Asset Management, Expense Growth for Strategic Investments

    JPMorgan Chase delivered strong Q4 FY25 results, driven by robust performance in Markets and Asset & Wealth Management, alongside continued franchise expansion. The firm is strategically increasing expenses in 2026 to fund long-term growth initiatives and technology, reflecting optimism about future opportunities despite potential regulatory headwinds in the credit card sector. Management emphasized a through-the-cycle approach to returns and efficiency, prioritizing investment for competitive advantage.

    Highlights

    5
    • Net income of $13 billion and EPS of $4.63, with an ROTCE of 18% for Q4 FY25.

    • Revenue of $46.8 billion, up 7% year-on-year, driven by higher Markets revenue and asset management fees.

    • Long-term net inflows of $52 billion for the quarter and $209 billion for the full year in Asset & Wealth Management.

    • Strong franchise growth with 1.7 million net new checking accounts and 10.4 million new card accounts for the full year.

    • CIB reported net income of $7.3 billion, with Markets revenue up 7% in Fixed Income and 40% in Equities year-on-year.

    Concerns

    5
    • Standardized CET1 ratio decreased by 30 basis points quarter-over-quarter to 14.5% due to capital distributions and higher RWA.

    • IB fees were down 5% year-on-year in CIB, reflecting a strong prior year compare and deal timing.

    • 2026 adjusted expense is expected to be about $105 billion, representing meaningful growth in both dollar and percentage terms.

    • Potential for price controls on credit card interest rates could lead to extensive loss of credit access for consumers.

    • Wholesale credit portfolio shows a slight negative trend with downgrades exceeding upgrades and parameter updates for higher loss given default.

    Guidance & targets

    5
    CategoryTargetConfidence
    NII ex Markets
    about $95 billion
    high materiality
    High
    Total NII
    about $103 billion
    high materiality
    High
    Adjusted Expense
    about $105 billion
    high materiality
    High
    Card Net Charge-Off Rate
    approximately 3.4%
    medium materiality
    High
    Card Loan Growth
    something like 6% or 7%
    medium materiality
    Medium

    Segment performance

    4
    SegmentRevenueYoYQoQMargin
    Consumer & Community Banking (CCB)
    Revenue growth predominantly driven by higher NII on higher revolving balances in card and a higher deposit margin in Banking & Wealth Management. Consumers and small businesses remain resilient, with trends consistent with historical norms.
    Net income excluding reserve build for Apple Card: $5.3 billionDebit and credit sales volume growth: 7% YoYNet new checking accounts (full year): 1.7 millionNew card accounts (full year): 10.4 millionRecord households in wealth management (full year): stated
    $19.4 billion6%$3.6 billion
    Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB)
    Revenue growth driven by higher revenues in Markets, Payments, and Securities Services. IB fees were down due to a strong prior year compare and deal timing, but strong client engagement and deal activity are expected in 2026.
    IB fees growth: -5% YoYMarkets revenue growth: statedFixed Income revenue growth: 7% YoYEquities revenue growth: 40% YoY
    $19.4 billion10%$7.3 billion
    Asset & Wealth Management (AWM)
    Revenue growth predominantly driven by growth in management fees on higher average market levels and strong net inflows, as well as higher performance fees. Net inflows were positive across all channels, regions, and asset classes.
    Pretax margin: 38%Long-term net inflows (quarter): $52 billionLong-term net inflows (full year): $209 billionLiquidity net inflows (quarter): $105 billionLiquidity net inflows (full year): $183 billionRecord client asset net inflows (full year): $553 billion
    $6.5 billion13%$1.8 billion
    Corporate
    Reported net income and revenue for the quarter.
    $1.5 billion$307 million

    Operational metrics

    18
    Adjusted Net Income (Full Year)
    $57.5 billion
    FY25

    Excluding significant items listed in footnote.

    Adjusted EPS (Full Year)
    $20.18
    FY25

    Excluding significant items listed in footnote.

    Adjusted Revenue (Full Year)
    $185 billion
    FY25

    Excluding significant items listed in footnote.

    Adjusted ROTCE (Full Year)
    20%
    FY25

    Excluding significant items listed in footnote.

    Markets NII
    $8 billion
    FY26

    Expected to increase due to lower funding costs from rate cuts, primarily offset in NIR.

    Reserve Build (Apple Card)
    $2.2 billion
    Q4 FY25

    Related to the forward purchase commitment of the Apple Card portfolio.

    FDIC Special Assessment Accrual Release
    Q4 FY25

    Partially offset expense growth.

    Markets Revenue
    higherYoY
    Q4 FY25

    Contributed to overall revenue growth.

    Asset Management Fees
    higherYoY
    Q4 FY25

    Contributed to overall revenue growth.

    Auto Lease Income
    higherYoY
    Q4 FY25

    Contributed to overall revenue growth.

    NII ex Markets Drivers
    Q4 FY25

    Primarily driven by these factors.

    Expense Growth Drivers
    Q4 FY25

    Predominantly driven by these factors, partially offset by FDIC special assessment accrual release.

    Standardized RWA (Apple Card)
    $23 billion
    Q4 FY25

    Contribution from the Apple Card purchase commitment.

    Advanced RWA (Apple Card)
    $110 billion
    Q4 FY25

    Temporary elevated level, expected to reduce to approximately $30 billion in the near term.

    NBFI Exposure (internal definition)
    $160 billion
    Q4 FY25

    Narrower definition focusing on exposure collateralized by loans NBFIs make to end borrowers.

    NBFI Loss History
    one charge-off
    since 2018

    Despite significant growth in NBFI lending, loss experience has been minimal.

    Wholesale Credit Portfolio Trend
    more negative than positive
    Q4 FY25

    At the margin, a slight negative trend, but not broadly concerning.

    Loss Given Default Parameter Update
    Q4 FY25

    Drove a small increase in the allowance.

    Industry KPIs

    10
    MetricValueDetails
    Loans6% or 7%%
    Depositsmodest
    Rotce ROE18%%
    Cet1 ratio14.5%%
    Capital returns30 basis pointsbps
    Fee income linesdown 5%%
    Allowance reservesincrease
    Net interest income$95 billionUSD
    Net charge offs npls3.4%%
    Total operating expenses$24 billionUSD

    Deals & partnerships

    2
    AppleForward purchase commitment of the Apple Card portfolio

    Strategic partnership with Apple, a leader in payments innovation and user experience. Integration will take 2 years due to rebuilding Apple's iOS-integrated tech stack into JPMorgan's systems, aiming to accelerate modernization and enhance user-friendliness.

    CoinbaseAgreement to allow crypto purchases in the CCB ecosystem

    Part of JPMorgan's broader engagement with the crypto ecosystem and blockchain technology space.

    Risks & headwinds

    5
    Potential credit card APR capsNear-term (President's timeline for Jan 20)

    Extensive and broad loss of access to credit, especially for subprime borrowers.

    Mitigation: Contingency planning; advocacy against creation of parallel banking system without appropriate regulation.

    Geopolitical risks

    Enormous amount of risk, may or may not determine the state of the economy.

    Mitigation: Serve clients, deal and navigate with politics and issues globally, build business through the cycle.

    Large US deficitsLonger-term

    Quite large, will bite eventually.

    Mitigation: No specific mitigation stated, but acknowledged as a macro concern.

    Wholesale credit portfolio slight negative trendQ4 FY25

    Downgrades exceeding upgrades by a little bit; parameter updates for slightly higher loss given default.

    Mitigation: Monitoring; not broadly concerning, but reflects a normalization from exceptionally low charge-off levels.

    Basel III Endgame / G-SIB surcharge finalization uncertaintyComing months

    Rules aren't done yet; discussion about the right level of capital for banks.

    Mitigation: Advocacy for correct methodology across RWA, G-SIB, and stress testing; focus on making the system safer through capital, liquidity, and stress testing.

    What to watch in Q1 FY26

    5

    Apple Card integration progress

    Next quarter
    Current2-year integration process underway
    TargetKey milestones or updates on tech stack rebuild

    Why it matters

    Successful integration is key to realizing the strategic value and operational benefits of the Apple Card acquisition.

    The integration is going to take 2 years for a reason. We feel confident that we'll get it done successfully. And I think the process of getting it done, in the narrow sense, is going to make us better, just generally accelerate and challenge our modernization agenda and the user-friendliness of everything that we do in the card business.

    Q&A highlights

    6

    What is JPMorgan's view on the potential for stablecoin interest to draw deposits away from banks, and the banking system's risk if loopholes aren't closed?

    JPMorgan is actively involved in blockchain and crypto, but strongly advocates against a parallel banking system without prudential safeguards. While the impact on system-wide deposits is complex, there is clear risk to bank business models if stablecoins are unregulated. The firm evaluates digital assets based on consumer benefit.

    the creation of a parallel banking system that is sort of -- has all the features of banking, including something that looks a lot like a deposit that pays interest without sort of the associated prudential safeguards that have been developed over hundreds of years of bank regulation is an, obviously, like dangerous and undesirable thing.

    asked by Glenn Schorr · answered by Jeremy Barnum

    3 min read7 chapters

    Detailed Narrative

    01

    Strategic Investments and Expense Growth

    JPMorgan Chase plans for approximately $105 billion in adjusted expenses for FY26, a significant increase reflecting strategic investments across the business. These investments are aimed at long-term growth, including technology, branch expansion, payment systems, and personalization in consumer banking. Management views this expense growth as a reflection of optimism about the company's opportunity set and a necessity to maintain a competitive edge against traditional and non-traditional players, rather than a sacrifice of returns.

    02

    Apple Card Acquisition and Integration

    The acquisition of the Apple Card portfolio is described as an economically compelling transaction and a strategic partnership with Apple, a leader in payments innovation. The integration process is expected to take two years due to the need to rebuild Apple's unique iOS-integrated tech stack into JPMorgan's systems. This integration is anticipated to accelerate the bank's modernization agenda and enhance user-friendliness in its card business, with potential for broader application of customer service improvements.

    03

    Stablecoin and Digital Assets Strategy

    JPMorgan Chase is actively involved in the blockchain technology space through offerings like Kinexys and has launched tokenized money market funds. The firm is also expanding its engagement with the crypto ecosystem, including an agreement with Coinbase to allow crypto purchases within the CCB ecosystem. Management, along with other banks, advocates for appropriate regulation of stablecoins to prevent the creation of a parallel banking system without prudential safeguards, highlighting potential risks to banking system deposits if loopholes are not closed.

    04

    Non-Bank Financial Institution (NBFI) Lending

    The firm provided a detailed reconciliation of its NBFI exposure, using a narrower internal definition ($160 billion as of Q4 FY25) compared to the broader regulatory definition. Growth in NBFI lending over the past seven years is attributed to market dynamics and regulatory pressures🌐, including arbitrage opportunities where banks are better off holding collateralized pieces rather than direct loans. Despite significant growth, the loss history since 2018 shows only one charge-off, indicating structural protections, though risks remain in deep recessions or fraud instances.

    05

    Credit Card APR Regulation Concerns

    Management expressed significant concern over potential regulatory caps on credit card APRs, stating that such price controls would dramatically alter the provision of service. They anticipate that it would lead to a widespread loss of access to credit, particularly for subprime borrowers and those most in need, rather than simply compressing profit margins. While acknowledging the competitive nature of the card ecosystem, the firm views such regulation as a severe negative consequence for consumers and the economy, and a significant challenge to its own business.

    06

    Macro Outlook and Geopolitical Risks

    The short-term macro environment (6-12 months) is viewed as positive, supported by consumer strength, job availability, and stimulus. However, significant geopolitical risks and large US deficits are identified as longer-term concerns that could impact the economy. The firm emphasizes its commitment to serving clients globally and navigating political and economic complexities, maintaining that it can build its business effectively despite these uncertainties.

    07

    Capital and Regulatory Environment

    JPMorgan Chase expects to have significant excess capital ($30-40 billion or more) even after final regulatory rules. Management argues that the focus on capital is sometimes excessive, and that making the system safer involves a broader look at liquidity, stress testing, and resolution, not just capital. They advocate for a correct, data-driven methodology for capital requirements, rather than arbitrary targets, and highlight issues with the G-SIB surcharge methodology.

    AI-generated summary of the company’s earnings call. Not investment advice.