Detailed Narrative
Q2 Performance Overview
InTest reported Q2 revenue of $35.3 million, gross margin of 40.5%, and operating expenses of $13.9 million, aligning with its pre-announcement. Revenue was up 26% year-over-year, marking the third consecutive quarter of sequential growth and second consecutive quarter of over 25% YoY growth, driven by strong project delivery in auto EV and a building semiconductor funnel.
Order and Backlog Dynamics
Q2 orders were $28.9 million, down 9% sequentially but up 4% YoY. Semiconductor orders were a standout, increasing 56% sequentially and 64% YoY, converting the previously referenced 'semi wave' into actual orders. Auto EV orders declined 67% sequentially after four strong quarters, while Defense Aerospace orders decreased 28% sequentially but were up 70% YoY. Backlog stood at $45.4 million, a 12% sequential decrease, with approximately 45% expected to ship beyond Q3.
End Market Trends and Growth Drivers
The company sees expanding opportunities in higher-margin end markets. In semi, activity in back-end markets is picking up due to demand for testing high-power devices in the electrified economy. Defense and Aerospace benefits from higher DoD spending and capacity expansion. Auto EV demand remains healthy, supported by increasing electronic content in vehicles, with order activity following multi-year automotive programs.
Strategic Initiatives and Product Development
InTest is deepening its position with existing strategic accounts, cross-selling its broader portfolio, and expanding channel coverage. New products like the next-generation eco heat are progressing towards customer shipments. The company is also developing advanced high-powered chillers to meet demand for higher power conversion and focusing test solutions on high-power, high-voltage devices like silicon carbide and gallium nitride.
Operational Efficiency and Internal Controls
Management is undertaking an operational review to improve cost efficiencies and productivity, including examining the manufacturing footprint and business unit cost structure. This aims to build consistency in adjusted EBITDA performance. The company also disclosed a material weakness in internal controls at Alfamation related to Q1 revisions, with remediation plans in place expected to be effective by year-end.