Reverse DCF
Hindustan Unilever: what the price is assuming
A normal DCF asks you to guess growth. Run backwards, it takes today's price and solves for the growth the market has already priced in — then you can judge whether this company can deliver it.
What the price assumes
ExpensiveTo justify its price of ₹1927, this stock must grow earnings at 12% every year for 7 years. Our analysis caps realistic growth at ~5%. At that growth it is worth ₹1181 — downside of 39%.
- Growth the price implies
- 12.0% a year
- for 7 years, fading to 5%
- It has actually compounded at
- 3.3% a year
- net profit, FY23–FY26 · EPS 3.4%
- The gap
- 0.1 pp
- -39% downside if it only repeats history
Why this baseline, and what it is built on
Hindustan Unilever shows stable financials, but recent TTM sales growth is low at 1.81%. The promise track record is good, with many achieved promises, though some were ghosted. Management guides for FY27 to be 'better than FY26' and prioritizes 'volume-led growth', while maintaining an EBITDA margin of 22.5-23.5%. Given the stable FMCG industry, good track record, but vague growth guidance and low recent TTM growth, a conservative g1 of 5.0% is chosen, anticipating a recovery in volume growth. Very low leverage and industry stability support a low discount rate of 9%. A longer 7-year stage-1 growth period with a 4-year fade to a 5% terminal growth rate is appropriate for a mature, market-leading FMCG player.
Through 2026-03-31
Your assumptions
Change any of these and the value moves. A valuation that flips on a one-point change in the required return is telling you something.
Value on these assumptions
₹1,179.49
Against today's price
-39%
11 projected years, then a terminal value at 5.0%.
Normalized net profit is discounted as a proxy for owner earnings, not full free cash flow. An analytical tool, not investment advice.
How to read this valuation
- Start from the price, not the forecast. A normal DCF asks you to guess growth and hands back a fair value. Run backwards, it takes today's price and solves for the earnings growth the market is already assuming.
- Compare that with what the company has done. The historical profit and EPS CAGR sit beside the implied number. A price that needs 25% a year from a business that has compounded at 10% is asking a lot, and the gap is the risk you are taking on.
- Then apply your own view. Change the growth rate, how long it lasts, how it fades and the return you require. A valuation that flips on a one-point change in the discount rate is telling you something about itself.
- Mind the caveats. Normalized net profit stands in for owner earnings, not full free cash flow; terminal growth is capped at 6%, roughly nominal GDP; cyclicals are flagged because a peak-earnings base overstates value. This is an analytical tool, not investment advice.